Evidence map›Paper›PMID 20708642›Full record

ArticleBehavioural brain research2011

Naloxone blocks ethanol-mediated appetitive conditioning and locomotor activation in adolescent rats.

Ricardo Marcos Pautassi, Michael E Nizhnikov, María Belén Acevedo, Norman E Spear

Open access · greenAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Behavioural brain research, 2011. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 9 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
9citing papers in PubMed
1.1field-weighted citation impact, top 28% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

9 citing papers in PubMed, 19 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors at 3 institutions in 2 countries.

Ricardo Marcos PautassiInstituto de Investigación Médica M. y M. Ferreyra (INIMEC-CONICET), Córdoba, C.P. 5000, Argentina. rpautassi@gmail.com
Michael E Nizhnikov
María Belén Acevedo
Norman E Spear
Binghamton University · USConsejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas · ARUniversidad Nacional de Córdoba · AR

Funding

Social Anxiety, Stress and Ethanol Sensitivity in Adolescence and AdulthoodP50AA017823 · NIAAA · UPSTATE MEDICAL UNIVERSITY · PI Marvin Rafael Diaz · 2009 to 2026
$30.5M
Ethanol Intake and Reinforcement in Infant RatsR01AA013098 · NIAAA · STATE UNIVERSITY OF NY,BINGHAMTON · PI SPEAR, NORMAN E · 2002 to 2012
$2.8M
EARLY ETHANOL--ANALYSIS AND PERSISTENCE OF CONSEQUENCESR01AA011960 · NIAAA · STATE UNIVERSITY OF NY,BINGHAMTON · PI SPEAR, NORMAN E · 1998 to 2008
$1.8M
Ontogenetic changes in ethanol's motivational properties: Involvement of the kappR21AA018164 · NIAAA · STATE UNIVERSITY OF NY,BINGHAMTON · PI NIZHNIKOV, MICHAEL E · 2009 to 2010
$419k
NIAAA NIH HHS AA011960NIAAA NIH HHS AA01309NIAAA NIH HHS AA017823NIAAA NIH HHS AA018164NIAAA NIH HHS P50 AA017823NIAAA NIH HHS R01 AA011960NIAAA NIH HHS R01 AA013098NIAAA NIH HHS R21 AA018164
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Age-related differences in ethanol sensitivity could put adolescents at risk for developing alcohol-related problems. Little information exists, however, about adolescent sensitivity to ethanol's appetitive effects and the neurobiological mechanisms underlying ethanol reinforcement during this developmental stage. The present study assessed the role of the opioid system in adolescent rats in an appetitive second-order schedule of ethanol reinforcement and ethanol-induced locomotor stimulation. On postnatal day 32 (PD32), animals were pretreated with the general opioid antagonist naloxone (0.0, 0.75, 1.50, or 2.5 mg/kg) and then given pairings of ethanol (0.0 or 2.0 g/kg, intragastrically) with intraoral pulses of water (conditioned stimulus 1 [CS₁], first-order conditioning phase). CS₁ delivery occurred 30-45 min after ethanol administration when the effect of ethanol was assumed to be appetitive. On PD33, adolescents were exposed to CS₁ (second-order conditioning phase) while in a chamber featuring distinctive exteroceptive cues (CS₂). Preference for CS₂ was then tested. Adolescents given CS₁-ethanol pairings exhibited greater preference for CS₂ than controls, indicating ethanol-mediated reinforcement, but only when not pretreated with naloxone. Blood alcohol levels during conditioning were not altered by naloxone. Experiment 2 revealed that ethanol-induced locomotor activation soon after administration, and naloxone dose-dependently suppressed this stimulating effect. The present study indicates that adolescent rats are sensitive to ethanol's reinforcing and locomotor-stimulating effects. Both effects of ethanol appear to be mediated by endogenous opioid system activation.

Indexed as

Reinforcement, PsychologyAnalysis of VarianceAnimalsConditioning, OperantDrug Administration ScheduleEthanolFemaleMaleMotor ActivityNaloxoneNarcotic AntagonistsRatsRats, WistarEthanolNaloxoneNarcotic Antagonists

Identifiers

PMID20708642
PMCPMC2975796
OpenAlexW1967131755

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.