ArticleBMC evolutionary biology2010
Genomic comparisons of Brucella spp. and closely related bacteria using base compositional and proteome based methods.
Article in BMC evolutionary biology, 2010. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 17 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
17 citing papers in PubMed, 30 citations in OpenAlex.
- Investigation of genomic island 2 deciphers the evolution of a genus Brucella.Scientific reports · 2025Article
- Establishment of a 23S rRNA assay for Brucella and its application in evaluating bacterial growth status.Veterinary research communications · 2025Article
- Review
- Laboratory Diagnosis of Human Brucellosis.Clinical microbiology reviews · 2019Review
- Selection of reference genes for measuring the expression of aiiO in Ochrobactrum quorumnocens A44 using RT-qPCR.Scientific reports · 2019Article
- Intracellular invasion and survival of Brucella neotomae, another possible zoonotic Brucella species.PloS one · 2019Article
- Article
- Whole-genome sequencing and antimicrobial resistance in Brucella melitensis from a Norwegian perspective.Scientific reports · 2018Article
- Application of real-time quantitative PCR assays for detecting marine Brucella spp. in fish.Journal of veterinary diagnostic investigation : official publication of the American Association of Veterinary Laboratory Diagnosticians, Inc · 2018Article
- Genome expansion in bacteria: the curios case of Chlamydia trachomatis.BMC research notes · 2015Article
- POGO-DB--a database of pairwise-comparisons of genomes and conserved orthologous genes.Nucleic acids research · 2014Article
- Entry and elimination of marine mammal Brucella spp. by hooded seal (Cystophora cristata) alveolar macrophages in vitro.PloS one · 2013Article
- Entrance and survival of Brucella pinnipedialis hooded seal strain in human macrophages and epithelial cells.PloS one · 2013Article
- Metagenomic microbial community profiling using unique clade-specific marker genes.Nature methods · 2012Article
- A genome-wide identification of genes potentially associated with host specificity of Brucella species.Journal of microbiology (Seoul, Korea) · 2011Article
- A review of Brucella infection in marine mammals, with special emphasis on Brucella pinnipedialis in the hooded seal (Cystophora cristata).Veterinary research · 2011Review
- The genome sequence of Brucella pinnipedialis B2/94 sheds light on the evolutionary history of the genus Brucella.BMC evolutionary biology · 2011Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors at 4 institutions in 3 countries.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundClassification of bacteria within the genus Brucella has been difficult due in part to considerable genomic homogeneity between the different species and biovars, in spite of clear differences in phenotypes. Therefore, many different methods have been used to assess Brucella taxonomy. In the current work, we examine 32 sequenced genomes from genus Brucella representing the six classical species, as well as more recently described species, using bioinformatical methods. Comparisons were made at the level of genomic DNA using oligonucleotide based methods (Markov chain based genomic signatures, genomic codon and amino acid frequencies based comparisons) and proteomes (all-against-all BLAST protein comparisons and pan-genomic analyses).
resultsWe found that the oligonucleotide based methods gave different results compared to that of the proteome based methods. Differences were also found between the oligonucleotide based methods used. Whilst the Markov chain based genomic signatures grouped the different species in genus Brucella according to host preference, the codon and amino acid frequencies based methods reflected small differences between the Brucella species. Only minor differences could be detected between all genera included in this study using the codon and amino acid frequencies based methods. Proteome comparisons were found to be in strong accordance with current Brucella taxonomy indicating a remarkable association between gene gain or loss on one hand and mutations in marker genes on the other. The proteome based methods found greater similarity between Brucella species and Ochrobactrum species than between species within genus Agrobacterium compared to each other. In other words, proteome comparisons of species within genus Agrobacterium were found to be more diverse than proteome comparisons between species in genus Brucella and genus Ochrobactrum. Pan-genomic analyses indicated that uptake of DNA from outside genus Brucella appears to be limited.
conclusionsWhile both the proteome based methods and the Markov chain based genomic signatures were able to reflect environmental diversity between the different species and strains of genus Brucella, the genomic codon and amino acid frequencies based comparisons were not found adequate for such comparisons. The proteome comparison based phylogenies of the species in genus Brucella showed a surprising consistency with current Brucella taxonomy.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.