Evidence map›Paper›PMID 20707908›Full record

ArticleBMC cancer2010

Distinguishing between cancer driver and passenger gene alteration candidates via cross-species comparison: a pilot study.

Xinglai Ji, Jie Tang, Richard Halberg, Dana Busam, Steve Ferriera, Maria Marjorette O Peña, Chinnambally Venkataramu, Timothy J Yeatman, Shaying Zhao

Open access · goldAbstract readComparative Study
In one paragraph

Article in BMC cancer, 2010. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 12 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
12citing papers in PubMed
1.5field-weighted citation impact, top 17% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

12 citing papers in PubMed, 19 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Palmoplantar Keratoderma in Slurp2-Deficient Mice.The Journal of investigative dermatology · 2016
    Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Mouse models for colorectal cancer.American journal of cancer research · 2013
    Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors at 5 institutions in 1 country.

Xinglai JiDepartment of Biochemistry and Molecular Biology, Institute of Bioinformatics, University of Georgia, Athens 30602, GA, USA.
Jie Tang
Richard Halberg
Dana Busam
Steve Ferriera
Maria Marjorette O Peña
Chinnambally Venkataramu
Timothy J Yeatman
Shaying Zhao
University of Georgia · USJ. Craig Venter Institute · USMoffitt Cancer Center · USUniversity of South Carolina · USUniversity of Wisconsin–Madison · US

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundWe are developing a cross-species comparison strategy to distinguish between cancer driver- and passenger gene alteration candidates, by utilizing the difference in genomic location of orthologous genes between the human and other mammals. As an initial test of this strategy, we conducted a pilot study with human colorectal cancer (CRC) and its mouse model C57BL/6J ApcMin/+, focusing on human 5q22.2 and 18q21.1-q21.2.

methodsWe first performed bioinformatics analysis on the evolution of 5q22.2 and 18q21.1-q21.2 regions. Then, we performed exon-targeted sequencing, real time quantitative polymerase chain reaction (qPCR), and real time quantitative reverse transcriptase PCR (qRT-PCR) analyses on a number of genes of both regions with both human and mouse colon tumors.

resultsThese two regions (5q22.2 and 18q21.1-q21.2) are frequently deleted in human CRCs and encode genuine colorectal tumor suppressors APC and SMAD4. They also encode genes such as MCC (mutated in colorectal cancer) with their role in CRC etiology unknown. We have discovered that both regions are evolutionarily unstable, resulting in genes that are clustered in each human region being found scattered at several distinct loci in the genome of many other species. For instance, APC and MCC are within 200 kb apart in human 5q22.2 but are 10 Mb apart in the mouse genome. Importantly, our analyses revealed that, while known CRC driver genes APC and SMAD4 were disrupted in both human colorectal tumors and tumors from ApcMin/+ mice, the questionable MCC gene was disrupted in human tumors but appeared to be intact in mouse tumors.

conclusionsThese results indicate that MCC may not actually play any causative role in early colorectal tumorigenesis. We also hypothesize that its disruption in human CRCs is likely a mere result of its close proximity to APC in the human genome. Expanding this pilot study to the entire genome may identify more questionable genes like MCC, facilitating the discovery of new CRC driver gene candidates.

Indexed as

Gene Expression Regulation, NeoplasticGenome, HumanAnimalsBase SequenceChromosomes, Human, Pair 18Chromosomes, Human, Pair 5Colorectal NeoplasmsComputational BiologyEvolution, MolecularGenes, APCGenes, DCCGenes, MCCHumansMiceMolecular Sequence DataPilot ProjectsSmad4 Protein

Identifiers

PMID20707908
PMCPMC2927548
OpenAlexW2165465290

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.