Evidence map›Paper›PMID 20707804›Full record

ReviewCancer science2010

WASP and WAVE family proteins: friends or foes in cancer invasion?

Shusaku Kurisu, Tadaomi Takenawa

Open access · bronzeAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Cancer science, 2010. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 48 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
48citing papers in PubMed
2.7field-weighted citation impact, top 11% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

48 citing papers in PubMed, 90 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Functional Profiling of Soft Tissue Sarcoma Using Mechanistic Models.International journal of molecular sciences · 2023
    Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. Article
  11. Review
  12. Review
  13. Breast cancer (Dove Medical Press) · 2021
    Review
  14. Invadopodia: clearing the way for cancer cell invasion.Annals of translational medicine · 2020
    Review
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Shusaku KurisuDivision of Lipid Biochemistry, Department of Biochemistry and Molecular Biology, Kobe University Graduate School of Medicine, Kobe, Hyogo, Japan.
Tadaomi Takenawa
Kobe University · JP

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Wiskott-Aldrich syndrome protein (WASP) and WASP family verprolin-homologous protein (WAVE) family proteins activate cells' major actin nucleating machinery, the actin-related protein 2/3 (Arp2/3) complex, leading to the formation and remodeling of cortical actin filament networks. Cortical actin regulation is critical in many aspects of cell physiology including cell-cell adhesion and cell motility, whose dysregulation is directly associated with cancer invasion and metastasis. In line with this association, the WASP and WAVE family proteins have been reported to be involved in cancer malignancies. What is puzzling, however, is that they can act as either enhancers or suppressors of cancer malignancies depending on the type of cancer and its pathological stage. We are still far from understanding the roles of the WASP and WAVE family proteins in cancer progression. Here, we summarize the recent advances of studies of the WASP and WAVE family proteins with respect to cancer invasion and we offer a model that can account for the diverse outcomes originating from dysregulated WASP and WAVE family proteins in cancer development.

Indexed as

Neoplasm InvasivenessActin-Related Protein 2-3 ComplexCell AdhesionCell MovementExtracellular MatrixHumansWiskott-Aldrich Syndrome Protein FamilyActin-Related Protein 2-3 ComplexWiskott-Aldrich Syndrome Protein Family

Identifiers

PMID20707804
PMCPMC11158077
OpenAlexW2006511476

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.