Evidence map›Paper›PMID 20707673›Full record

ReviewAnnual review of genetics2010

Bacterial antisense RNAs: how many are there, and what are they doing?

Maureen Kiley Thomason, Gisela Storz

Open access · greenAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Annual review of genetics, 2010. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 202 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
202citing papers in PubMed
29.4field-weighted citation impact, top 1% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

202 citing papers in PubMed, 348 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Regulatory RNAs inSynthetic and systems biotechnology · 2024
    Review
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. The RNA chaperone Hfq has a multifaceted role inFrontiers in cellular and infection microbiology · 2024
    Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Life science alliance · 2023
    Article
  19. Review
  20. Article

142 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Maureen Kiley ThomasonCell Biology and Metabolism Program, Eunice Kennedy Shriver National Institute of Child Health and Human Development, Bethesda, Maryland 20892-5430, USA. kileyma@mail.nih.gov
Gisela Storz
Eunice Kennedy Shriver National Institute of Child Health and Human Development · USGeorgetown University Medical Center · US

Funding

Small Regulatory RNAsZIAHD001608 · NICHD · EUNICE KENNEDY SHRIVER NATIONAL INSTITUTE OF CHILD HEALTH & HUMAN DEVELOPMENT · PI STORZ, GISELA · 2009 to 2025
$16.9M
Intramural NIH HHS ZIA HD001608
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Antisense RNAs encoded on the DNA strand opposite another gene have the potential to form extensive base-pairing interactions with the corresponding sense RNA. Unlike other smaller regulatory RNAs in bacteria, antisense RNAs range in size from tens to thousands of nucleotides. The numbers of antisense RNAs reported for different bacteria vary extensively, but hundreds have been suggested in some species. If all of these reported antisense RNAs are expressed at levels sufficient to regulate the genes encoded opposite them, antisense RNAs could significantly impact gene expression in bacteria. Here, we review the evidence for these RNA regulators and describe what is known about the functions and mechanisms of action for some of these RNAs. Important considerations for future research as well as potential applications are also discussed.

Indexed as

Gene Expression Regulation, BacterialBacteriaRNA, AntisenseRNA, BacterialRNA, AntisenseRNA, Bacterial

Identifiers

PMID20707673
PMCPMC3030471
OpenAlexW2098889266

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.