Evidence map›Paper›PMID 20704560›Full record

ReviewCurrent Alzheimer research2010

Why so few drugs for Alzheimer's disease? Are methods failing drugs?

R E Becker, N H Greig

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Current Alzheimer research, 2010. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 24 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
24citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

24 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Trial
  2. Phenserine efficacy in Alzheimer's disease.Journal of Alzheimer's disease : JAD · 2010
    Trial
  3. NaI/PPhBeilstein journal of organic chemistry · 2023
    Article
  4. Article
  5. Does traumatic brain injury hold the key to the Alzheimer's disease puzzle?Alzheimer's & dementia : the journal of the Alzheimer's Association · 2018
    Review
  6. Article
  7. Re-Engineering Alzheimer Clinical Trials: Global Alzheimer's Platform Network.The journal of prevention of Alzheimer's disease · 2016
    Article
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Review
  11. Lessons from a BACE1 inhibitor trial: off-site but not off base.Alzheimer's & dementia : the journal of the Alzheimer's Association · 2014
    Article
  12. Review
  13. Review
  14. Article
  15. Review
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Fire in the ashes: can failed Alzheimer's disease drugs succeed with second chances?Alzheimer's & dementia : the journal of the Alzheimer's Association · 2013
    Article
  19. Article
  20. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

R E BeckerDrug Design & Development Section, Laboratory of Neurosciences, Intramural Research Program, National Institute on Aging, National Institutes of Health, Baltimore, MD 21224, USA.
N H Greig

Funding

Design And Development Of Experimental Therapeutics ((Systemic & Neurodegenerative Disorders and Alzheimer's Disease)ZIAAG000311 · NIA · NATIONAL INSTITUTE ON AGING · PI GREIG, NIGEL H. · 2009 to 2025
$16.0M
Design And Development Of Experimental TherapeuticsZ01AG000311 · NIA · NATIONAL INSTITUTE ON AGING · PI GREIG, NIGEL H. · 2001 to 2008
$1.7M
Intramural NIH HHS Z01 AG000311
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Recent studies of Alzheimer's disease (AD) and other neuropsychiatric drug developments raise questions whether failures of some drugs occur due to flaws in methods. In three case studies of recent AD drug development failures with phenserine, metrifonate, and tarenflurbil we identified methodological lapses able to account for the failures. Errors in complex systems such as drug developments are both almost inescapable due to human mistakes and most frequently hidden at the time of occurrence and thereafter. We propose preemptive error management as a preventive strategy to exclude or control error intrusions into neuropsychiatric drug developments. We illustrate the functions we anticipate for a preemptive error management preventive strategy with a checklist and identify the limitations of this aspect of the proposal with three drug examples. This strategy applies core scientific practices to insure the quality of data within the current context of AD drug development practices.

Indexed as

Alzheimer DiseaseClinical Trials as TopicDrug EvaluationHumansNeuroprotective AgentsNeuroprotective Agents

Identifiers

PMID20704560
PMCPMC3010269

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.