Evidence map›Paper›PMID 20704523›Full record

ArticleScandinavian journal of primary health care2010

Influence of CRP testing and clinical findings on antibiotic prescribing in adults presenting with acute cough in primary care.

Kristin Alise Jakobsen, Hasse Melbye, Mark J Kelly, Christina Ceynowa, Sigvard Mölstad, Kerenza Hood, Christopher C Butler

Open access · greenAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Scandinavian journal of primary health care, 2010. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 48 papers, 4 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
48citing papers in PubMed, 4 pooled it
5.1field-weighted citation impact, top 5% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

48 citing papers in PubMed, 4 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 89 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. Pooled it
  5. Comparing GPs' antibiotic prescribing decisions to a clinical prediction rule: an online vignette study.The British journal of general practice : the journal of the Royal College of General Practitioners · 2023
    Trial
  6. Trial
  7. Associations with antibiotic prescribing for acute exacerbation of COPD in primary care: secondary analysis of a randomised controlled trial.The British journal of general practice : the journal of the Royal College of General Practitioners · 2021
    Trial
  8. Trial
  9. Chest auscultation - tradition and expectationsScandinavian journal of primary health care · 2026
    Review
  10. Observational
  11. Review
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Review
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors at 3 institutions in 3 countries.

Kristin Alise JakobsenDepartment of Community Medicine, University of Tromsø, Tromsø, Norway. Kristin.jakobsen@uit.no
Hasse Melbye
Mark J Kelly
Christina Ceynowa
Sigvard Mölstad
Kerenza Hood
Christopher C Butler
Cardiff University · GBUiT The Arctic University of Norway · NOLinköping University · SE

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectiveRespiratory tract infections are the most common indication for antibiotic prescribing in primary care. The value of clinical findings in lower respiratory tract infection (LRTI) is known to be overrated. This study aimed to determine the independent influence of a point of care test (POCT) for C-reactive protein (CRP) on the prescription of antibiotics in patients with acute cough or symptoms suggestive of LRTI, and how symptoms and chest findings influence the decision to prescribe when the test is and is not used.

designProspective observational study of presentation and management of acute cough/LRTI in adults.

settingPrimary care research networks in Norway, Sweden, and Wales. SUBJECTS: Adult patients contacting their GP with symptoms of acute cough/LRTI.

main outcome measuresPredictors of antibiotic prescribing were evaluated in those tested and those not tested with a POCT for CRP using logistic regression and receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve analysis.

resultsA total of 803 patients were recruited in the three networks. Among the 372 patients tested with a POCT for CRP, the CRP value was the strongest independent predictor of antibiotic prescribing, with an odds ratio (OR) of CRP ≥ 50 mg/L of 98.1. Crackles on auscultation and a patient preference for antibiotics perceived by the GP were the strongest predictors of antibiotic prescribing when the CRP test was not used.

conclusionsThe CRP result is a major influence in the decision whether or not to prescribe antibiotics for acute cough. Clinicians attach less weight to discoloured sputum and abnormal lung sounds when a CRP value is available. CRP testing could prevent undue reliance on clinical features that poorly predict benefit from antibiotic treatment.

Indexed as

Acute DiseaseAdultAnti-Bacterial AgentsCoughC-Reactive ProteinDrug UtilizationHumansMiddle AgedNorwayPractice Patterns, Physicians'Primary Health CareProspective StudiesRespiratory Tract InfectionsSwedenWalesAnti-Bacterial AgentsC-Reactive Protein

Identifiers

PMID20704523
PMCPMC3444795
OpenAlexW2121093175

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.