ArticleJournal of medical systems2012
Provider stakeholders' perceived benefit from a nascent health information exchange: a qualitative analysis.
Article in Journal of medical systems, 2012. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 13 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
13 citing papers in PubMed.
- The health data utility and the resurgence of health information exchanges as a national resource.Journal of the American Medical Informatics Association : JAMIA · 2025Article
- Successes and Barriers of Health Information Exchange Participation Across Hospitals in South Carolina From 2014 to 2020: Longitudinal Observational Study.JMIR medical informatics · 2023Observational
- Physician leadership and health information exchange: literature review.BMJ health & care informatics · 2019Review
- Linking the health data system in the U.S.: Challenges to the benefits.International journal of nursing sciences · 2017Review
- The Feasibility of Using Electronic Health Records to Describe Demographic and Clinical Indicators of Migrant and Seasonal Farmworkers.Journal of agromedicine · 2016Article
- Health information technology adoption in California community health centers.The American journal of managed care · 2015Article
- Barriers over time to full implementation of health information exchange in the United States.JMIR medical informatics · 2014Article
- Economic impact assessment from the use of a mobile app for the self-management of heart diseases by patients with heart failure in a Spanish region.Journal of medical systems · 2014Article
- Factors related to health information exchange participation and use.Journal of medical systems · 2014Article
- Factors associated with health information exchange system usage in a safety-net ambulatory care clinic setting.Journal of medical systems · 2012Article
- Organizational challenges in developing one of the Nationwide Health Information Network trial implementation awardees.Journal of medical systems · 2012Article
- The association between health information exchange and measures of patient satisfaction.Applied clinical informatics · 2011Article
- Transitioning From Paper to Digital: State Statutory and Regulatory Frameworks for Health Information Technology.Public health reports (Washington, D.C. : 1974)Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
We sought to better understand the perceived costs and benefits of joining a nascent health information exchange (HIE) from the perspective of potential provider organization participants. We therefore conducted semi-structured interviews with organizational representatives. Interview transcriptions were thematically coded, and coded text was subsequently aggregated to summarize the breadth and depth of responses. Although no respondents expected HIE to result in net financial benefit to their organization, all respondents recognized some potential benefits, and some respondents expected HIE to result in overall organizational benefit. Disproportionate benefit was expected for the poorest, sickest patients. Many respondents had concerns about HIE increasing the risk of data security breaches, and these concerns were most pronounced at larger organizations. We found little evidence of organizational concern regarding loss of patients to other organizations or publication of unfavorable quality data. If HIE's greatest benefactors are indeed the poorest, sickest patients, our current health care financing environment will make it difficult to align HIE costs with benefits. To sustain HIE, state and federal governments may need to consider ongoing subsidies. Furthermore, these governments will need to ensure that policies regulating data exchange have sufficient nationwide coordination and liability limitations that the perceived organizational risks of joining HIEs do not outweigh perceived benefits. HIE founders can address organizational concerns by attempting to coordinate HIE policies with those of their largest founding organizations, particularly for data security policies. Early HIE development and promotional efforts should not only focus on potential benefits, but should also address organizational concerns.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.