Evidence map›Paper›PMID 20702783›Full record

ArticleMolecular & cellular proteomics : MCP2010

Identification of essential filovirion-associated host factors by serial proteomic analysis and RNAi screen.

Kevin B Spurgers, Tim Alefantis, Brian D Peyser, Gordon T Ruthel, Alison A Bergeron, Julie A Costantino, Sven Enterlein, Krishna P Kota, R C Dutch Boltz, M Javad Aman and 2 more

Open access · hybridAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Molecular & cellular proteomics : MCP, 2010. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 49 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
49citing papers in PubMed
2.3field-weighted citation impact, top 12% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

49 citing papers in PubMed, 72 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Disruption of Ebola NPJournal of molecular biology · 2023
    Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Review
  13. Review
  14. Molecular characterization and expression analysis ofSaudi journal of biological sciences · 2021
    Article
  15. Review
  16. Article
  17. Review
  18. Review
  19. Chaperoning theViruses · 2018
    Review
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

12 authors at 4 institutions in 1 country.

Kevin B SpurgersThe United States Army Medical Research Institute of Infectious Diseases, 1425 Porter Street, Fort Detrick, Frederick, MD 21702, USA.
Tim Alefantis
Brian D Peyser
Gordon T Ruthel
Alison A Bergeron
Julie A Costantino
Sven Enterlein
Krishna P Kota
R C Dutch Boltz
M Javad Aman
Vito G Delvecchio
Sina Bavari
United States Army Medical Research Institute of Infectious Diseases · USIntegrated BioTherapeutics (United States) · USVital Probes (United States) · USPerkinElmer (United States) · US

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

An assessment of the total protein composition of filovirus (ebolavirus and marburgvirus) virions is currently lacking. In this study, liquid chromatography-linked tandem mass spectrometry of purified ebola and marburg virions was performed to identify associated cellular proteins. Host proteins involved in cell adhesion, cytoskeleton, cell signaling, intracellular trafficking, membrane organization, and chaperones were identified. Significant overlap exists between this data set and proteomic studies of disparate viruses, including HIV-1 and influenza A, generated in multiple cell types. However, the great majority of proteins identified here have not been previously described to be incorporated within filovirus particles. Host proteins identified by liquid chromatography-linked tandem mass spectrometry could lack biological relevance because they represent protein contaminants in the virus preparation, or because they are incorporated within virions by chance. These issues were addressed using siRNA library-mediated gene knockdown (targeting each identified virion-associated host protein), followed by filovirus infection. Knockdown of several host proteins (e.g. HSPA5 and RPL18) significantly interfered with ebolavirus and marburgvirus infection, suggesting specific and relevant virion incorporation. Notably, select siRNAs inhibited ebolavirus, but enhanced marburgvirus infection, suggesting important differences between the two viruses. The proteomic analysis presented here contributes to a greater understanding of filovirus biology and potentially identifies host factors that can be targeted for antiviral drug development.

Indexed as

ProteomicsRNA InterferenceAmino Acid SequenceChromatography, LiquidElectrophoresis, Polyacrylamide GelFiloviridaeGene Knockdown TechniquesMicroscopy, FluorescenceMolecular Sequence DataPolymerase Chain ReactionTandem Mass SpectrometryViral ProteinsVirionViral Proteins

Identifiers

PMID20702783
PMCPMC3101857
OpenAlexW2150680899

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.