Evidence map›Paper›PMID 20702550›Full record

ArticleBMJ (Clinical research ed.)2010

Equity in access to total joint replacement of the hip and knee in England: cross sectional study.

Andy Judge, Nicky J Welton, Jat Sandhu, Yoav Ben-Shlomo

Open access · hybridAbstract readMulticenter Study
In one paragraph

Article in BMJ (Clinical research ed.), 2010. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 59 papers, 6 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
59citing papers in PubMed, 6 pooled it
47.0field-weighted citation impact, top 1% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

59 citing papers in PubMed, 6 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 147 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. Pooled it
  5. Pooled it
  6. Pooled it
  7. Trial
  8. Trial
  9. Trial
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Total Hip Arthroplasty in Chile Is Characterized By Low Utilization Rates and Disparity in Access.HSS journal : the musculoskeletal journal of Hospital for Special Surgery · 2024
    Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors at 2 institutions in 2 countries.

Andy JudgeDepartment of Social Medicine, University of Bristol, Bristol BS8 2PS. Andrew.Judge@ndorms.ox.ac.uk
Nicky J Welton
Jat Sandhu
Yoav Ben-Shlomo
University of Bristol · GBNIHR Oxford Musculoskeletal Biomedical Research Centre · GB

Funding

Department of HealthMedical Research Council G0802413
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectiveTo explore geographical and sociodemographic factors associated with variation in equity in access to total hip and knee replacement surgery.

designCombining small area estimates of need and provision to explore equity in access to care.

settingEnglish census wards. SUBJECTS: Patients throughout England who needed total hip or knee replacement and numbers who received surgery.

main outcome measuresPredicted rates of need (derived from the Somerset and Avon Survey of Health and English Longitudinal Study of Ageing) and provision (derived from the hospital episode statistics database). Equity rate ratios comparing rates of provision relative to need by sociodemographic, hospital, and distance variables.

resultsFor both operations there was an "n" shaped curve by age. Compared with people aged 50-59, those aged 60-84 got more provision relative to need, while those aged >or=85 received less total hip replacement (adjusted rate ratio 0.68, 95% confidence interval 0.65 to 0.72) and less total knee replacement (0.87, 0.82 to 0.93). Compared with women, men received more provision relative to need for total hip replacement (1.08, 1.05 to 1.10) and total knee replacement (1.31, 1.28 to 1.34). Compared with the least deprived, residents in the most deprived areas got less provision relative to need for total hip replacement (0.31, 0.30 to 0.33) and total knee replacement (0.33, 0.31 to 0.34). For total knee replacement, those in urban areas got higher provision relative to need, but for total hip replacement it was highest in villages/isolated areas. For total knee replacement, patients living in non-white areas received more provision relative to need (1.04, 1.00 to 1.07) than those in predominantly white areas, but for total hip replacement there was no effect. Adjustment for hospital characteristics did not attenuate the effects.

conclusionsThere is evidence of inequity in access to total hip and total knee replacement surgery by age, sex, deprivation, rurality, and ethnicity. Adjustment for hospital and distance did not attenuate these effects. Policy makers should examine factors at the level of patients or primary care to understand the determinants of inequitable provision.

Indexed as

AgedAged, 80 and overArthroplasty, Replacement, HipArthroplasty, Replacement, KneeCross-Sectional StudiesEnglandFemaleHealth Services AccessibilityHealth Services Needs and DemandHospitalizationHumansMaleMiddle AgedResidence CharacteristicsSocioeconomic Factors

Identifiers

PMID20702550
PMCPMC2920379
OpenAlexW2083552295

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.