Evidence map›Paper›PMID 20702426›Full record

ArticleNucleic acids research2010

Codon reassignment in the Escherichia coli genetic code.

Takahito Mukai, Akiko Hayashi, Fumie Iraha, Aya Sato, Kazumasa Ohtake, Shigeyuki Yokoyama, Kensaku Sakamoto

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Nucleic acids research, 2010. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 100 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
100citing papers in PubMed
5.1field-weighted citation impact, top 4% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

100 citing papers in PubMed, 198 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Review
  5. Review
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Review
  11. Article
  12. Genetic Code Expansion: Another Solution to Codon Assignments.International journal of molecular sciences · 2022
    Article
  13. Review
  14. Article
  15. Review
  16. Review
  17. Reprogramming the genetic code.Nature reviews. Genetics · 2021
    Review
  18. Directed Evolution of theInternational journal of molecular sciences · 2021
    Article
  19. Review
  20. Review

40 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Takahito MukaiRIKEN Systems and Structural Biology Center, 1-7-22 Suehiro-cho, Tsurumi, Yokohama 230-0045, Japan.
Akiko Hayashi
Fumie Iraha
Aya Sato
Kazumasa Ohtake
Shigeyuki Yokoyama
Kensaku Sakamoto
The University of Tokyo · JPSystems Biology Institute · JP

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Most organisms, from Escherichia coli to humans, use the 'universal' genetic code, which have been unchanged or 'frozen' for billions of years. It has been argued that codon reassignment causes mistranslation of genetic information, and must be lethal. In this study, we successfully reassigned the UAG triplet from a stop to a sense codon in the E. coli genome, by eliminating the UAG-recognizing release factor, an essential cellular component, from the bacterium. Only a few genetic modifications of E. coli were needed to circumvent the lethality of codon reassignment; erasing all UAG triplets from the genome was unnecessary. Thus, UAG was assigned unambiguously to a natural or non-natural amino acid, according to the specificity of the UAG-decoding tRNA. The result reveals the unexpected flexibility of the genetic code.

Indexed as

CodonAmino AcidsCodon, TerminatorEscherichia coliEscherichia coli ProteinsGene DeletionPeptide Termination FactorsAmino AcidsCodonCodon, TerminatorEscherichia coli ProteinsPeptide Termination FactorsprfA protein, E coli

Identifiers

PMID20702426
PMCPMC3001078
OpenAlexW1969330612

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.