Evidence map›Paper›PMID 20702407›Full record

ArticleThe Journal of biological chemistry2010

Regulation of response regulator autophosphorylation through interdomain contacts.

Christopher M Barbieri, Timothy R Mack, Victoria L Robinson, Matthew T Miller, Ann M Stock

Open access · hybridAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in The Journal of biological chemistry, 2010. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 47 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
47citing papers in PubMed
2.7field-weighted citation impact, top 11% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

47 citing papers in PubMed, 70 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Structure of phosphorylated-like RssB, the adaptor delivering σThe Journal of biological chemistry · 2023
    Article
  5. Article
  6. Nutrient Limitation SensitizesACS infectious diseases · 2023
    Article
  7. Structural insights into the transcription activation mechanism of the global regulator GlnR from actinobacteria.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2023
    Article
  8. Review
  9. Review
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors at 1 institution in 2 countries.

Christopher M BarbieriCenter for Advanced Biotechnology and Medicine, University of Medicine and Dentistry of New Jersey-Robert Wood Johnson Medical School, Piscataway, New Jersey 08854-5635, USA.
Timothy R Mack
Victoria L Robinson
Matthew T Miller
Ann M Stock
Rutgers, The State University of New Jersey · US

Funding

Structure and Function of Response Regulator ProteinsR37GM047958 · NIGMS · UNIV OF MED/DENT NJ-R W JOHNSON MED SCH · PI STOCK, ANN M. · 2003 to 2013
$3.4M
Howard Hughes Medical InstituteNIGMS NIH HHS R37 GM047958NIGMS NIH HHS R37GM047958
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

DNA-binding response regulators (RRs) of the OmpR/PhoB subfamily alternate between inactive and active conformational states, with the latter having enhanced DNA-binding affinity. Phosphorylation of an aspartate residue in the receiver domain, usually via phosphotransfer from a cognate histidine kinase, stabilizes the active conformation. Many of the available structures of inactive OmpR/PhoB family proteins exhibit extensive interfaces between the N-terminal receiver and C-terminal DNA-binding domains. These interfaces invariably involve the α4-β5-α5 face of the receiver domain, the locus of the largest differences between inactive and active conformations and the surface that mediates dimerization of receiver domains in the active state. Structures of receiver domain dimers of DrrB, DrrD, and MtrA have been determined, and phosphorylation kinetics were analyzed. Analysis of phosphotransfer from small molecule phosphodonors has revealed large differences in autophosphorylation rates among OmpR/PhoB RRs. RRs with substantial domain interfaces exhibit slow rates of phosphorylation. Rates are greatly increased in isolated receiver domain constructs. Such differences are not observed between autophosphorylation rates of full-length and isolated receiver domains of a RR that lacks interdomain interfaces, and they are not observed in histidine kinase-mediated phosphotransfer. These findings suggest that domain interfaces restrict receiver domain conformational dynamics, stabilizing an inactive conformation that is catalytically incompetent for phosphotransfer from small molecule phosphodonors. Inhibition of phosphotransfer by domain interfaces provides an explanation for the observation that some RRs cannot be phosphorylated by small molecule phosphodonors in vitro and provides a potential mechanism for insulating some RRs from small molecule-mediated phosphorylation in vivo.

Indexed as

Protein ConformationATP-Binding Cassette TransportersBacterial ProteinsBinding SitesCrystallizationDimerizationGenes, RegulatorModels, MolecularMolecular Sequence DataPhosphorylationTrans-ActivatorsATP-Binding Cassette TransportersBacterial ProteinsMtrA protein, Bacteriaosmolarity response regulator proteinsPhoB protein, BacteriaTrans-Activators

Identifiers

PMID20702407
PMCPMC2952233
OpenAlexW2060289339

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.