ArticleBioinformatics (Oxford, England)2010
Cross-species queries of large gene expression databases.
Article in Bioinformatics (Oxford, England), 2010. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 15 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
15 citing papers in PubMed.
- CoSIA: an R Bioconductor package for CrOss Species Investigation and Analysis.Bioinformatics (Oxford, England) · 2023Article
- CoSIA: an R Bioconductor package for CrOss Species Investigation and Analysis.bioRxiv : the preprint server for biology · 2023Article
- Bipartite tight spectral clustering (BiTSC) algorithm for identifying conserved gene co-clusters in two species.Bioinformatics (Oxford, England) · 2021Article
- Learning a genome-wide score of human-mouse conservation at the functional genomics level.Nature communications · 2021Article
- Cross-Species Annotation of Expressed Genes and Detection of Different Functional Gene Modules Between 10 Cold- and 10 Hot-Propertied Chinese Herbal Medicines.Frontiers in genetics · 2020Article
- Multi-Level Comparative Framework Based on Gene Pair-Wise Expression Across Three Insulin Target Tissues for Type 2 Diabetes.Frontiers in genetics · 2019Article
- The Pathway Coexpression Network: Revealing pathway relationships.PLoS computational biology · 2018Article
- TROM: A Testing-Based Method for Finding Transcriptomic Similarity of Biological Samples.Statistics in biosciences · 2017Article
- ModuleBlast: identifying activated sub-networks within and across species.Nucleic acids research · 2015Article
- Comparison of Gene Coexpression Profiles and Construction of Conserved Gene Networks to Find Functional Modules.PloS one · 2015Article
- Drug similarity search based on combined signatures in gene expression profiles.Healthcare informatics research · 2014Article
- A novel method for cross-species gene expression analysis.BMC bioinformatics · 2013Article
- Pathprinting: An integrative approach to understand the functional basis of disease.Genome medicine · 2013Article
- Matching experiments across species using expression values and textual information.Bioinformatics (Oxford, England) · 2012Article
- Ortho2ExpressMatrix--a web server that interprets cross-species gene expression data by gene family information.BMC genomics · 2011Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
Abstract
motivationExpression databases, including the Gene Expression Omnibus and ArrayExpress, have experienced significant growth over the past decade and now hold hundreds of thousands of arrays from multiple species. Since most drugs are initially tested on model organisms, the ability to compare expression experiments across species may help identify pathways that are activated in a similar way in humans and other organisms. However, while several methods exist for finding co-expressed genes in the same species as a query gene, looking at co-expression of homologs or arbitrary genes in other species is challenging. Unlike sequence, which is static, expression is dynamic and changes between tissues, conditions and time. Thus, to carry out cross-species analysis using these databases, we need methods that can match experiments in one species with experiments in another species.
resultsTo facilitate queries in large databases, we developed a new method for comparing expression experiments from different species. We define a distance metric between the ranking of orthologous genes in the two species. We show how to solve an optimization problem for learning the parameters of this function using a training dataset of known similar expression experiments pairs. The function we learn outperforms previous methods and simpler rank comparison methods that have been used in the past for single species analysis. We used our method to compare millions of array pairs from mouse and human expression experiments. The resulting matches can be used to find functionally related genes, to hypothesize about biological response mechanisms and to highlight conditions and diseases that are activating similar pathways in both species. AVAILABILITY: Supporting methods, results and a Matlab implementation are available from http://sb.cs.cmu.edu/ExpQ/.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.