Evidence map›Paper›PMID 20702077›Full record

ReviewCurrent opinion in cell biology2011

Kinetochore assembly: if you build it, they will come.

Karen E Gascoigne, Iain M Cheeseman

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Current opinion in cell biology, 2011. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 40 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
40citing papers in PubMed
3.9field-weighted citation impact, top 6% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

40 citing papers in PubMed, 67 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Trial
  2. Article
  3. The cell cycle, cancer development and therapy.Molecular biology reports · 2022
    Review
  4. Review
  5. Kinetochore assembly throughout the cell cycle.Seminars in cell & developmental biology · 2021
    Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Review
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Review
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. The kinetochore.Cold Spring Harbor perspectives in biology · 2014
    Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Karen E GascoigneWhitehead Institute for Biomedical Research, and Department of Biology, Massachusetts Institute of Technology, Nine Cambridge Center, Cambridge, MA 02142, United States. karengas@wi.mit.edu
Iain M Cheeseman
Whitehead Institute for Biomedical Research · US

Funding

Molecular Analysis of the Kinetochore-Microtubule InterfaceR01GM088313 · NIGMS · WHITEHEAD INSTITUTE FOR BIOMEDICAL RES · PI CHEESEMAN, IAIN MCPHERSON · 2009 to 2017
$3.6M
NIGMS NIH HHS R01 GM088313
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Accurate chromosome segregation requires the interaction of chromosomes with the microtubules from the mitotic spindle. This interaction is mediated by the macro-molecular kinetochore complex, which assembles only at the centromeric region of each chromosome. However, how this site is specified and how assembly of the kinetochore structure is regulated in coordination with cell cycle progression remains unclear. Recent studies have begun to shed light on the mechanisms underlying assembly of this complex structure.

Indexed as

AnimalsHumansKinetochoresMicrofilament ProteinsProtein Processing, Post-TranslationalMicrofilament Proteins

Identifiers

PMID20702077
PMCPMC2980799
OpenAlexW1972784371

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.