Evidence map›Paper›PMID 20701411›Full record

ArticleDrug safety2010

Safety profile of the fluoroquinolones: analysis of adverse drug reactions in relation to prescription data using four regional pharmacovigilance databases in Italy.

Francesco Lapi, Marco Tuccori, Domenico Motola, Alessandra Pugi, Michele Vietri, Nicola Montanaro, Alberto Vaccheri, Olivia Leoni, Alfredo Cocci, Roberto Leone and 7 more

Abstract readComparative Study
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Drug safety, 2010. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 14 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
14citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
1.5field-weighted citation impact, top 18% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

14 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 36 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Quinolone Allergy.Pharmacy (Basel, Switzerland) · 2019
    Review
  10. Update on Quinolone Allergy.Current allergy and asthma reports · 2017
    Review
  11. Article
  12. Sources of European drug consumption data at a country level.International journal of public health · 2014
    Article
  13. Review
  14. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

17 authors at 5 institutions in 1 country.

Francesco LapiDepartment of Pharmacology, University of Florence, Tuscan Regional Centre of Pharmacovigilance, Florence, Italy. francesco.lapi@unifi.it
Marco Tuccori
Domenico Motola
Alessandra Pugi
Michele Vietri
Nicola Montanaro
Alberto Vaccheri
Olivia Leoni
Alfredo Cocci
Roberto Leone
Anita Conforti
Ugo Moretti
Emiliano Sessa
Giampiero Mazzaglia
Alessandro Mugelli
Teresita Mazzei
Alfredo Vannacci
University of Florence · ITUniversity of Pisa · ITUniversity of Verona · ITAgenzia Regionale di Sanità della Toscana · ITUniversity of Bologna · IT

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundFluoroquinolones are widely used both in primary care and in hospital settings. Since the last comparison performed in Italy on the safety profiles of different fluoroquinolones, a new molecule, prulifloxacin, has been introduced into the market and several warnings concerning this class of drugs have been released. The aim of this study was to reassess the safety profiles of fluoroquinolones using the database of the Italian Interregional Group of Pharmacovigilance (IGP) and the administrative data of fluoroquinolone prescriptions.

methodsAll adverse drug reactions (ADRs) reported in four Italian regions (Lombardy, Veneto, Emilia Romagna and Tuscany) were retrieved from the IGP database. Consumption data (defined daily dose [DDD]/1000 inhabitants/day) were used as denominators. Both single reports and all ADRs (classified by System Organ Classes and MedDRA Preferred Term [PT]) due to fluoroquinolones were considered as numerators of each analysis, comparing two periods (2005 vs 2006). All fluoroquinolones with at least ten reports per year were included in the analysis.

resultsOn the basis of 272 reports (532 single ADRs or PTs), patients did not show any statistically significant differences between 2005 and 2006 in terms of sex, age and number of concurrent medications. After adjustment for drug consumption, moxifloxacin showed the highest reporting rate (84.6 reports/DDD/1000 inhabitants/day; 15.4 serious reports/DDD/1000 inhabitants/day) followed by prulifloxacin (72.2; 22.2 serious) and levofloxacin (55.3; 30.6 serious) in 2005. An increment of ADR/report rates was observed over the 2 years for all fluoroquinolones except prulifloxacin, which had the lowest ADR reporting rate in 2006 (25.0; 12.5 serious). In 2006, the rate of serious ADRs associated with prulifloxacin was lower than with ciprofloxacin, while in 2005 serious events were almost equal for both compounds (55.6 vs 47.6 serious ADRs/DDD/1000 inhabitants/day). Ciprofloxacin showed the highest proportion of cutaneous PTs (e.g. rash, exanthema). Tendinopathies were mainly due to levofloxacin.

conclusionsThese data suggest that different fluoroquinolones are characterized by different rates and types of ADRs. Among them, prulifloxacin was associated with more ADRs than other fluoroquinolones in 2005 but with fewer ADRs in 2006, when its consumption increased. Although these findings may represent an encouraging perspective towards a more appropriate use of fluoroquinolones because of their individual safety profiles, further pharmacoepidemiological studies must be performed to substantiate these results.

Indexed as

AdolescentAdultAdverse Drug Reaction Reporting SystemsAgedAged, 80 and overAnti-Infective AgentsChildDatabases, FactualFemaleFluoroquinolonesHumansItalyMaleMiddle AgedYoung AdultAnti-Infective AgentsFluoroquinolones

Identifiers

PMID20701411
OpenAlexW1494061392

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.