Evidence map›Paper›PMID 20700794›Full record

Trial reportJapanese journal of ophthalmology2010

Twenty-four-hour ocular hypotensive effects of 0.0015% tafluprost and 0.005% latanoprost in healthy subjects.

Hideki Mochizuki, Hideki Itakura, Tomoko Yokoyama, Michiya Takamatsu, Yoshiaki Kiuchi

Abstract readComparative StudyRandomized Controlled Trial
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Trial report in Japanese journal of ophthalmology, 2010. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 8 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
8citing papers in PubMed
1.7field-weighted citation impact, top 16% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

8 citing papers in PubMed, 16 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Trial
  2. Trial
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Review
  6. Review
  7. Review
  8. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Hideki MochizukiDepartment of Ophthalmology and Visual Science, Graduate School of Biomedical Science, Hiroshima University, Minami-ku, Hiroshima, Japan. mochizuki-h@hiroshima-u.ac.jp
Hideki Itakura
Tomoko Yokoyama
Michiya Takamatsu
Yoshiaki Kiuchi
Hiroshima University · JP

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

purposeTo compare the intraocular pressure (IOP) reduction over 24 h achieved with tafluprost (0.0015%) with that achieved with latanoprost (0.005%).

methodsTwenty-seven healthy volunteers were studied. After a 24-h IOP baseline measurement was taken, one ophthalmic solution was applied to the right eye daily for 7 days. The drug was then withdrawn for 2 weeks. The other agent was then applied to the left eye in the same manner. IOP was measured every 3 h for 24 h on the seventh day of treatment.

resultsThe 24-h IOP after 7 days' treatment with latanoprost decreased from 11.5 mmHg at baseline to 9.7 mmHg (-1.8 mmHg) and that with tafluprost from 11.8 to 9.8 mmHg (-1.9 mmHg). Tafluprost was statistically more effective after 24 h (P = 0.007; paired t test). The number of subjects with a 24-h mean IOP reduction of <10% was 8/27 (29.6%) with latanoprost versus 4/27 (14.8%) with tafluprost. The incidence of conjunctival hyperemia with latanoprost was 4/27 (14.8%) and that with tafluprost was 8/27 (29.6%).

conclusionThe overall efficacies of the two agents were not different, but tafluprost was associated with a greater reduction in IOP at 24 h after administration. Tafluprost showed a higher rate of conjunctival hyperemia.

Indexed as

Administration, TopicalAdultAntihypertensive AgentsCircadian RhythmCross-Over StudiesFemaleHumansIntraocular PressureLatanoprostMaleOphthalmic SolutionsProspective StudiesProstaglandins FProstaglandins F, SyntheticTonometry, OcularVisual AcuityAntihypertensive AgentsLatanoprostOphthalmic SolutionsProstaglandins FProstaglandins F, Synthetictafluprost

Identifiers

PMID20700794
OpenAlexW2062285070

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.