Evidence map›Paper›PMID 20700727›Full record

ArticleInternational urogynecology journal2011

Use of Surgisis mesh in the management of polypropylene mesh erosion into the vagina.

Su-Yen Khong, Alan Lam

Abstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in International urogynecology journal, 2011. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
6citing papers in PubMed
1.6field-weighted citation impact, top 18% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

6 citing papers in PubMed, 14 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Update in management of vaginal mesh erosion.Current urology reports · 2013
    Review
  5. Mesh complications in female pelvic floor reconstructive surgery and their management: A systematic review.Indian journal of urology : IJU : journal of the Urological Society of India · 2012
    Article
  6. Partial nephrectomy using porcine small intestinal submucosa.World journal of surgical oncology · 2011
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Su-Yen KhongCentre for Advanced Reproductive Endosurgery, AMA Building, Suite 408, Level 4, 69 Christie Street, St. Leonards, NSW 2065, Australia. su-yen@sydneycare.com.au
Alan Lam

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

introduction and hypothesismesh in pelvic reconstructive surgery is being used increasingly in clinical practice. Complications such as mesh erosion and dyspareunia can cause significant patient morbidity. In cases where vaginal mesh erosions are large or multifocal resulting in inadequate healthy epithelium for repair, this may lead to recurrent mesh erosion or vaginal stenosis.

methodnine patients with synthetic mesh erosion who failed to respond to conservative measures were managed surgically with Surgisis.

resultsthe median time at which patients presented with mesh erosion was 12 weeks. The size of erosion ranged from 1 to 4 cm in diameter. At follow-up, five patients were cured, three still had evidence of mesh erosion although the overall defects were smaller, and one patient required further surgery.

conclusionwith mesh erosion being a troublesome reality following insertion of synthetic mesh repairs, Surgisis may prove to be a useful option in the treatment of large vaginal mesh defects.

Indexed as

AdultAnimalsBiocompatible MaterialsDevice RemovalFemaleFollow-Up StudiesHumansMiddle AgedPelvic Organ ProlapsePolypropylenesRetrospective StudiesSecondary PreventionSurgical MeshSwineTreatment OutcomeVaginaBiocompatible MaterialsPolypropylenes

Identifiers

PMID20700727
OpenAlexW1998024300

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.