Evidence map›Paper›PMID 20700726›Full record

ArticleSocial psychiatry and psychiatric epidemiology2011

Crisis resolution/home treatment team workers' understandings of the concept of crisis.

Simon Tobitt, Sunjeev Kamboj

Abstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Social psychiatry and psychiatric epidemiology, 2011. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
6citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

6 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Simon TobittWestways Resource Centre, South London and Maudsley NHS Foundation Trust, 49 St James's Road, Croydon, CR0 2UR, UK. Simon.Tobitt@slam.nhs.uk
Sunjeev Kamboj

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundThe crisis resolution/home treatment (CR/HT) model has brought significant reform of acute mental health care in the UK and beyond. The complex issue of conceptualising crisis is, however, overlooked in CR/HT literature. This study aimed to investigate how crisis is understood amongst those working in CR/HT teams.

methodFramework analysis was applied to semi-structured interviews with 39 CR/HT workers representative of multidisciplinary mix and drawn from four different teams.

resultsWhilst there was an acknowledgment of the concept's complex nature, there was consensus in: respondents' characterising of crisis; about three different presenting clinical patterns ('clusters') encountered in CR/HT work; and, the pattern of the crisis phenomenon over time.

conclusionsThe findings suggest further development of the CR/HT model, including improving conceptual clarity (to benefit communication with referrers and judge clinical outcome), better timed intervention, and varying intervention for different clusters of crisis presentation.

Indexed as

Home Care ServicesAdultConcept FormationCrisis InterventionEnglandFemaleHumansInterview, PsychologicalMaleMiddle AgedPatient Care TeamPsychological TheoryQualitative ResearchWorkforce

Identifiers

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.