Evidence map›Paper›PMID 20700673›Full record

ArticleClinical orthopaedics and related research2011

Patient perceived outcomes after primary hip arthroplasty: does gender matter?

Carlos J Lavernia, Jose C Alcerro, Juan S Contreras, Mark D Rossi

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Clinical orthopaedics and related research, 2011. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 20 papers, 3 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
20citing papers in PubMed, 3 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

20 citing papers in PubMed, 3 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Do we need gender-specific total joint arthroplasty?Clinical orthopaedics and related research · 2011
    Pooled it
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Observational
  9. Review
  10. Article
  11. Review
  12. Review
  13. Article
  14. Improvement of activities of daily living after total hip arthroplasty using a computed tomography-based navigation system.Journal of artificial organs : the official journal of the Japanese Society for Artificial Organs · 2017
    Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Does ipsilateral knee pain improve after hip arthroplasty?Clinical orthopaedics and related research · 2012
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Carlos J LaverniaOrthopaedic Institute at Mercy Hospital, 3659 South Miami Avenue, Suite 4008, Miami, FL 33133, USA. CLavernia@mercymiami.org
Jose C Alcerro
Juan S Contreras
Mark D Rossi

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundTotal hip arthroplasty (THA) provides high functional scores and long-term survivorship. However, differences in function and disability between men and women before and after arthroplasty are not well understood. QUESTIONS/PURPOSES: We determined if there was a gender difference in patient-perceived functional measures and range of motion in primary THA.

methodsWe retrospectively studied 532 patients (658 hips) undergoing primary THA. A total of 59% were women and 41% were men. Patients were assessed preoperatively and at minimum 2 years using Quality of Well-being, SF-36, WOMAC, and Harris hip score. We determined if differences existed between genders before and at followup for all dependent measures. Independent t-tests were also used to determine differences between genders concerning the change (Δ) scores and hip range of motion. The time course of perceived functional recovery was also documented.

resultsMales were on average 5 years (58) younger than females (63). Before surgery, females scored worse than males on the Harris hip score, WOMAC function, WOMAC pain, and WOMAC total scores. All scores improved at followup in both groups. Regardless of time, females had lower scores than males. However, females had greater improvement over males for WOMAC function (39 versus 35), WOMAC pain (11 versus 10), and WOMAC total (53 versus 48).

conclusionsSubstantial gender functional differences exist before treatment. However, women reported greater improvement as a result of the intervention when compared with men. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Level III, prognostic study. See Guidelines for Authors for a complete description of levels of evidence.

Indexed as

Outcome Assessment, Health CarePatient SatisfactionAgedArthroplasty, Replacement, HipDisability EvaluationFemaleHumansMaleMiddle AgedOsteoarthritis, HipPostoperative ComplicationsQuality of LifeRecovery of FunctionRetrospective StudiesSelf-AssessmentSex Factors

Identifiers

PMID20700673
PMCPMC3018219

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.