Evidence map›Paper›PMID 20699396›Full record

ArticlePlant physiology2010

The glabra1 mutation affects cuticle formation and plant responses to microbes.

Ye Xia, Keshun Yu, Duroy Navarre, Kenneth Seebold, Aardra Kachroo, Pradeep Kachroo

Open access · hybridAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Plant physiology, 2010. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 45 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
45citing papers in PubMed
9.9field-weighted citation impact, top 2% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

45 citing papers in PubMed, 106 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Review
  2. MYB Transcription Factors Negatively RegulatePlants (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026
    Article
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Identification and expression profiling of theFrontiers in plant science · 2025
    Article
  6. Mechanosensation in leaf veins.Science advances · 2023
    Article
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Review
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Review
  15. Article
  16. Review
  17. Frontiers in plant science · 2021
    Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.

Ye XiaDepartment of Plant Pathology, University of Kentucky, Lexington, Kentucky 40546, USA.
Keshun Yu
Duroy Navarre
Kenneth Seebold
Aardra Kachroo
Pradeep Kachroo
United States Department of Agriculture · USAgricultural Research Service · USUniversity of Kentucky · US

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Systemic acquired resistance (SAR) is a form of defense that provides resistance against a broad spectrum of pathogens in plants. Previous work indicates a role for plastidial glycerolipid biosynthesis in SAR. Specifically, mutations in FATTY ACID DESATURASE7 (FAD7), which lead to reduced trienoic fatty acid levels and compromised plastidial lipid biosynthesis, have been associated with defective SAR. We show that the defective SAR in Arabidopsis (Arabidopsis thaliana) fad7-1 plants is not associated with a mutation in FAD7 but rather with a second-site mutation in GLABRA1 (GL1), a gene well known for its role in trichome formation. The compromised SAR in gl1 plants is associated with impairment in their cuticles. Furthermore, mutations in two other components of trichome development, GL3 and TRANSPARENT TESTA GLABRA1, also impaired cuticle development and SAR. This suggests an overlap in the biochemical pathways leading to cuticle and trichome development. Interestingly, exogenous application of gibberellic acid (GA) not only enhanced SAR in wild-type plants but also restored SAR in gl1 plants. In contrast to GA, the defense phytohoromes salicylic acid and jasmonic acid were unable to restore SAR in gl1 plants. GA application increased levels of cuticular components but not trichome formation on gl1 plants, thus implicating cuticle, but not trichomes, as an important component of SAR. Our findings question the prudence of using mutant backgrounds for genetic screens and underscore a need to reevaluate phenotypes previously studied in the gl1 background.

Indexed as

Plant ImmunityArabidopsisArabidopsis ProteinsCyclopentanesDNA-Binding ProteinsFatty Acid DesaturasesFatty AcidsGene Expression Regulation, PlantGenetic Complementation TestGibberellinsMembrane LipidsMutationOxylipinsPlant EpidermisPlants, Genetically ModifiedSalicylic AcidArabidopsis ProteinscutinCyclopentanesDNA-Binding ProteinsFad7 protein, ArabidopsisFatty Acid DesaturasesFatty Acidsgibberellic acidGibberellinsGL1 protein, Arabidopsisjasmonic acidMembrane LipidsOxylipinsSalicylic AcidWaxes

Identifiers

PMID20699396
PMCPMC2949009
OpenAlexW1998679905

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.