Evidence map›Paper›PMID 2069844›Full record

ArticleBritish journal of cancer1991

Mast cell modulation of tumour cell proliferation in rat mammary adenocarcinoma 13762NF.

M K Dabbous, L Haney, G L Nicolson, D Eckley, D E Woolley

Open access · bronzeAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in British journal of cancer, 1991. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 14 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
14citing papers in PubMed
1.0field-weighted citation impact, top 24% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

14 citing papers in PubMed, 49 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Tumor microenvironment: a main actor in the metastasis process.Clinical & experimental metastasis · 2012
    Review
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Mast cells in melanocytic tumours.Archives of dermatological research · 1995
    Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors at 3 institutions in 2 countries.

M K DabbousDepartment of Biochemistry, University of Tennessee, Memphis 38163.
L Haney
G L Nicolson
D Eckley
D E Woolley
University of Tennessee Health Science Center · USWithington Community Hospital · GBUniversity of Tennessee at Knoxville · US

Funding

THE COLLAGENOLYTIC SYSTEM OF INVASIVE TUMORSR01CA025617 · NCI · UNIVERSITY OF TENNESSEE HEALTH SCI CTR · PI DABBOUS, MUSTAFA KH. · 1985 to 1990
–
TUMOR METASTASISR35CA044352 · NCI · UNIVERSITY OF TEXAS MD ANDERSON CAN CTR · PI NICOLSON, GARTH L · 1987 to 1993
–
NCI NIH HHS CA-25617NCI NIH HHS CA-44352
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Mast cells were shown to accumulate around the periphery of the invasive and metastatic rat mammary adenocarcinoma (MTLn3), and histological evidence of mast cell degranulation was observed during the later stages of this model. To assess the physiological role of mast cells in vivo we have used the mast cell-stabilising compound FPL 55618 applied i.p. daily at 1 mg kg-1 for 23 days. Using groups of 12 rats we have found that this compound inhibited tumour growth at the primary site by as much as 70% in most of the treated animals compared with the control group which received equivalent volumes of saline. When the drug treatment was stopped after 23 days, tumour growth of the test group accelerated over the next 7 days and reached a similar tumour size to that of control animals. Histological studies of the tumour and contiguous host tissue at day 24 of the experiment revealed numerous extra-tumoural mast cells often showing signs of degranulation at several sites around the tumour periphery in the control animals. Such observations were not seen in those animals receiving FPL 55618 where, in contrast to controls, numerous intact mast cells were often seen within the tumour mass. Following cessation of the MC-stabilising treatment progressive mast cell activation was evident within 2-4 days, primarily at the tumour periphery. In vitro studies have shown that drug concentrations equivalent to five times the in vivo dose had no effect on the proliferative rate or viability of the MTLn3 cells. Moreover, the proliferative rate of these cells in culture was significantly increased when exposed to soluble mast cell products. Thus our data indicate that a mast cell-stabilising compound has significant benefits in reducing tumour growth in vivo, an observation which supports the concept that mast cell:tumour cell interactions are important for the growth and invasive properties demonstrated by this model of breast carcinoma.

Indexed as

AdenocarcinomaAnimalsCell CountCell DivisionCell LineChromonesMammary Neoplasms, ExperimentalMast CellsRatsChromonesFPL 55618

Identifiers

PMID2069844
PMCPMC1972547
OpenAlexW2038774594

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.