Evidence map›Paper›PMID 20698041›Full record

ReviewWorld journal of gastroenterology2010

Esophageal resection for high-grade dysplasia and intramucosal carcinoma: When and how?

Vani J A Konda, Mark K Ferguson

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in World journal of gastroenterology, 2010. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 9 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
9citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

9 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Interventional Therapy of Esophageal Cancer.Gastrointestinal tumors · 2016
    Review
  4. Review
  5. Review
  6. Endoscopic methods in the treatment of early-stage esophageal cancer.Wideochirurgia i inne techniki maloinwazyjne = Videosurgery and other miniinvasive techniques · 2014
    Review
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Gastroesophageal reflux disease: From heartburn to cancer.World journal of gastroenterology · 2010
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Vani J A KondaDepartment of Medicine, The University of Chicago Pritzker School of Medicine, Chicago, IL 60637, United States. vkonda@medicine.bsd.uchicago.edu
Mark K Ferguson

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

High-grade dysplasia (HGD) and intramucosal carcinoma (IMC) in the setting of Barrett's esophagus have traditionally been treated with esophagectomy. However, with the advent of endoscopic mucosal resection and endoscopic ablative therapies, endoscopic therapy at centers with expertise is now an established treatment of Barrett's-esophagus-related neoplasia, including HGD and IMC. Esophagectomy is today reserved for more selected cases with submucosal invasion, evidence for lymph node metastasis, or unsuccessful endoscopic therapy.

Indexed as

EsophagectomyAdenocarcinomaBarrett EsophagusDisease ProgressionEsophageal NeoplasmsEsophagusHumansMetaplasiaMucous MembranePatient SelectionPrecancerous ConditionsRisk AssessmentRisk FactorsTreatment Outcome

Identifiers

PMID20698041
PMCPMC2921090

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.