ArticleJournal of general internal medicine2010
What happens after an elevated PSA test: the experience of 13,591 veterans.
Article in Journal of general internal medicine, 2010. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 15 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
15 citing papers in PubMed.
- Article
- Low-Value Prostate-Specific Antigen Test for Prostate Cancer Screening and Subsequent Health Care Utilization and Spending.JAMA network open · 2022Article
- Optimization of a Quality Improvement Tool for Cancer Diagnosis in Primary Care: Qualitative Study.JMIR formative research · 2022Article
- Unscreened older men diagnosed with prostate cancer are at increased risk of aggressive disease.Prostate cancer and prostatic diseases · 2017Article
- Prostate Cancer Education, Detection, and Follow-Up in a Community-Based Multiethnic Cohort of Medically Underserved Men.American journal of men's health · 2017Article
- Determining optimal prostate-specific antigen thresholds to identify an increased 4-year risk of prostate cancer development: an analysis within the Veterans Affairs Health Care System.World journal of urology · 2016Article
- Appropriateness of Prostate Cancer Imaging among Veterans in a Delivery System without Incentives for Overutilization.Health services research · 2016Article
- Exosomal lncRNA-p21 levels may help to distinguish prostate cancer from benign disease.Frontiers in genetics · 2015Article
- Do racial disparities exist in the use of prostate cancer screening and detection tools in veterans?Urologic oncology · 2014Article
- Patterns of clinical response to PSA elevation in American Indian/Alaska Native men: a multi-center pilot study.Journal of health care for the poor and underserved · 2013Article
- Hyperglycemia and prostate cancer recurrence in men treated for localized prostate cancer.Prostate cancer and prostatic diseases · 2013Article
- Developing software to "track and catch" missed follow-up of abnormal test results in a complex sociotechnical environment.Applied clinical informatics · 2013Article
- Design of a prostate cancer patient navigation intervention for a Veterans Affairs hospital.BMC health services research · 2012Article
- Biopsy follow-up of prostate-specific antigen tests.American journal of preventive medicine · 2012Article
- New serum biomarkers for prostate cancer diagnosis.Clinical cancer investigation journalArticle
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundThe occurrence and timing of prostate biopsy following an elevated prostate-specific antigen (PSA) test varied considerably in randomized screening trials.
objectiveExamine practice patterns in routine clinical care in response to an elevated PSA test (≥4 ng/μl) and determine whether time to biopsy was associated with cancer stage at diagnosis.
designRetrospective cohort study.
participantsAll veterans (n=13,591) in the Pacific Northwest VA Network with a PSA ≥4 ng/μl between 1998 and 2006 and no previous elevated PSA tests or prostate biopsy. MAIN MEASURES: We assessed follow-up care including additional PSA testing, urology consults, and biopsies. We compared stage at diagnosis for men who were biopsied within 24 months vs. those men biopsied and diagnosed>24 months after the elevated PSA test. KEY
resultsTwo-thirds of patients received follow-up evaluation within 24 months of the elevated PSA test: 32.8% of men underwent a biopsy, 15.5% attended a urology visit but were not biopsied, and 18.8% had a subsequent normal PSA test. Younger age, higher PSA levels, more prior PSA tests, no co-payment requirements, existing urologic conditions, low body mass index, and low comorbidity scores were associated with more complete follow-up. Among men who underwent radical prostatectomy, a delayed diagnosis was not significantly associated with having a pathologically advanced-stage cancer (T3/T4), although we found an increased likelihood of presenting with stage T2C relative to stage T2A or T2B cancer.
conclusionsFollow-up after an elevated PSA test is highly variable with more than a third of men receiving care that could be considered incomplete. A delayed diagnosis was not associated with poorer prognosis.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.