ArticleThe Journal of membrane biology2010
The effect of holding potential on charge translocation by the Na+/K +-ATPase in the absence of potassium.
Article in The Journal of membrane biology, 2010. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Effects of oligomycin on transient currents carried by Na+ translocation of Bufo Na+/K(+)-ATPase expressed in Xenopus oocytes.The Journal of membrane biology · 2011Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
Abstract
The Na(+)/K(+)-ATPase exports 3Na(+) and imports 2K(+) at the expense of the hydrolysis of 1 ATP. In the absence of K(+), it carries on electroneutral, Na(+)-dependent transient charge movement (also known as "electroneutral Na(+)/Na(+) exchange mode") and produces a transient current containing faster and slower components in response to a sudden voltage step. Components with different speeds represent sequential release of Na(+) ions from three binding sites. The effect of holding potential on slow charge movement was studied in the presence of different concentrations of ADP(i), Na (i) (+) and Na (o) (+) with the intention of improving our understanding of Na (i) (+) binding. However, the manipulation of [ADP](i) and [Na(+)](i) did not cause as pronounced changes as predicted in the magnitude of charge movement (Q (tot)), which indicated that our experimental conditions were not able to backwardly drive reaction across the energy barrier to Na (i) (+) release/rebinding steps. On the contrary, lowering [Na(+)](o) caused evident dependence of Q (tot) on holding potential, with characteristics suggesting that pumps were escaping from E2P through the uncoupled Na(+) efflux activity.
Indexed as
Identifiers
20697887What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.