Evidence map›Paper›PMID 20697755›Full record

Trial reportClinical oral investigations2011

Sealing proximal surfaces with polyurethane tape: three-year evaluation.

Mohammad Alkilzy, Christine Berndt, Christian H Splieth

Abstract readComparative StudyRandomized Controlled Trial
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Trial report in Clinical oral investigations, 2011. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers, 5 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
7citing papers in PubMed, 5 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

7 citing papers in PubMed, 5 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. Interventions for treating cavitated or dentine carious lesions.The Cochrane database of systematic reviews · 2021
    Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. Pooled it
  5. Pooled it
  6. Review
  7. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Mohammad AlkilzyDepartment of Preventive and Pediatric Dentistry, Ernst Moritz Arndt University, Greifswald, Rotgerberstrasse 8, 17487 Greifswald, Germany. alkilzy@hotmail.com
Christine Berndt
Christian H Splieth

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The purpose of this investigation was to test the safety and clinical effect of a new material for the treatment of proximal caries. In 50 patients with two proximal initial lesions, one of the lesions was randomly chosen and sealed with a thin polyurethane-dimethacrylate foil using bonding. The other lesion received oral home care and was left as the control. In clinical follow-ups after 6 and 12 months and X-ray evaluation after 2 and 3 years, the sealants showed good retention, marginal adaptation, and color. No relevant significant differences in plaque accumulation or gingival status were found between sealed and control teeth. On the radiographs, almost all sealed and control lesions appeared stable, indicating an arrest of the lesion. In conclusion, sealing initial proximal lesions showed no clinical problems and mostly arrest of caries on bitewing radiographs.

Indexed as

Acid Etching, DentalAcrylatesAcrylic ResinsColorComposite ResinsDental BondingDental CariesDental Marginal AdaptationDental PlaqueDMF IndexFemaleFollow-Up StudiesGingival HemorrhageHumansLight-Curing of Dental AdhesivesMaleAcrylatesAcrylic ResinsComposite ResinsheliobondHeliosealMethacrylatesphosphoric acidPhosphoric AcidsPit and Fissure Sealantspolyurethane dimethacrylatePolyurethanes

Identifiers

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.