ArticleBone marrow transplantation2011
Cyclosporine levels and rate of graft rejection following non-myeloablative conditioning for allogeneic hematopoietic SCT.
Article in Bone marrow transplantation, 2011. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
9 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Hematopoietic SCT (HSCT) after non-myeloablative conditioning is associated with reduced TRM, and increased risk of graft rejection. Although preclinical data have shown the importance of post transplant immunosuppression in achieving engraftment, little is known about the role of CSA in the clinical setting of non-myeloablative transplantation. In a retrospective analysis of patients treated with allogeneic HSCT after fludarabine and 2 Gy TBI, 15 of 77 evaluable patients (20%) experienced primary (n=2) or secondary graft rejection at a median of 66 days post transplant. Mean day 1-28 CSA trough levels were inversely associated with day 28 chimerism (median 99, 85 and 70% for mean CSA <300, 300-600 and >600 ng/mL, respectively; P=0.003). A similar association was observed for the cumulative incidence of graft rejection, which occurred in 8% (<300 ng/mL), 26% (300-600 ng/mL) and 50% (>600 ng/mL, P=0.005) of patients. The detrimental effect of high CSA levels on engraftment was confirmed in multivariable models and was found to operate comparably in sibling and unrelated donor transplants. Impairment of donor T-cell function by high serum levels of CSA might account for this finding, which should be verified in a larger patient group to better understand the role of CSA in non-myeloablative transplantation.
Indexed as
Identifiers
20697371What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.