ArticleBone marrow transplantation2011
Early detection of relapse in patients with myelodysplastic syndrome after allo-SCT.
Article in Bone marrow transplantation, 2011. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
5 citing papers in PubMed, 19 citations in OpenAlex.
- Article
- Review
- Monitoring minimal residual/relapsing disease after allogeneic haematopoietic stem cell transplantation in adult patients with acute lymphoblastic leukaemia.Bone marrow transplantation · 2020Article
- Mutation Clearance after Transplantation for Myelodysplastic Syndrome.The New England journal of medicine · 2018Article
- Hematopoietic Stem Cell Transplantation in the Management of Myelodysplastic Syndrome: A Retrospective, Current, and Future Perspective.Cell transplantationReview
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Allo-SCT is the only potentially curative regimen for myelodysplastic syndromes (MDSs), but it is associated with a high relapse risk. The role of chimerism analysis for prediction of relapse is yet to be determined. To assess the clinical usefulness of mixed chimerism (MC) for predicting hematological relapse, 75 consecutively transplanted patients with MDS were analyzed with regard to lineage-specific chimerism, encompassing CD33(+) cells in peripheral blood (PB, n=49) and CD34(+) cells in BM (n= 35). A cutoff of 5% recipient cells was used to discriminate complete donor chimerism from MC. A total of 19 patients (25%) experienced hematological relapse after a median of 5 (1-31) months. Sensitivity for detection of relapse was 59% for CD33(+) PB cells and 92% for CD34(+) BM cells with corresponding specificities of 91% and 65%. CD34(+) BM cells were analyzed before relapse in seven patients, five of whom showed MC at a median of 2.5 (0.5-7) months before relapse. In contrast, 8 of 18 patients showed MC involving CD33 PB with a median of one month (0.5-2) before relapse. Here, we provide a model for early detection of relapse after SCT in MDS, in which serial characterization of both CD33(+) PB cells and CD34(+) BM cells gives an opportunity for early treatment before overt relapse.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.