Evidence map›Paper›PMID 20697257›Full record

ReviewThe American journal of the medical sciences2010

Clostridium difficile infection.

Latisha Heinlen, Jimmy D Ballard

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in The American journal of the medical sciences, 2010. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 60 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
60citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

60 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Trial
  2. Comparison of the LuminexJournal of medical microbiology · 2025
    Article
  3. Lipidomics, Microbiota, and IntestinalInternational journal of molecular sciences · 2025
    Review
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. [Analysis ofNan fang yi ke da xue xue bao = Journal of Southern Medical University · 2024
    Article
  9. Review
  10. Article
  11. Review
  12. Microbiology (Reading, England) · 2023
    Review
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. About gladiators and a sacred disease.Biomedical journal · 2022
    Article
  18. Reduction in Health Care Facility-OnsetMayo Clinic proceedings. Innovations, quality & outcomes · 2021
    Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Latisha HeinlenDepartments of Internal Medicine, University of Oklahoma Health Sciences Center, Oklahoma City, Oklahoma 73104, USA.
Jimmy D Ballard

Funding

Systemic events in Clostridium difficile associated diseaseR01HL084489 · NHLBI · UNIVERSITY OF OKLAHOMA HLTH SCIENCES CTR · PI BALLARD, JIMMY D. · 2007 to 2011
$1.8M
NHLBI NIH HHS R01 HL084489
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Clostridium difficile is the leading cause of hospital-acquired diarrhea in Europe and North America and is a serious reemerging pathogen. Recent outbreaks have led to increasing morbidity and mortality and have been associated with a new strain (BI/NAP1/027) of C difficile that produces more toxin than historic strains. With the increasing incidence of C difficile infection, clinicians have also seen a change in the epidemiology with increased infections in previously low-risk populations. This chapter highlights the current knowledge on C difficile virulence, human disease, epidemic outbreaks and optimal treatment strategies.

Indexed as

Clostridioides difficileClostridium InfectionsHumansIncidence

Identifiers

PMID20697257
PMCPMC2935936

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.