Evidence map›Paper›PMID 20697069›Full record

Trial reportJournal of clinical oncology : official journal of the American Society of Clinical Oncology2010

Consolidation therapy with subcutaneous alemtuzumab after fludarabine and rituximab induction therapy for previously untreated chronic lymphocytic leukemia: final analysis of CALGB 10101.

Thomas S Lin, Kathleen A Donohue, John C Byrd, Margaret S Lucas, Eva E Hoke, Elizabeth M Bengtson, Kanti R Rai, James N Atkins, Brian K Link, Richard A Larson

Abstract readClinical Trial, Phase II
In one paragraph

Trial report in Journal of clinical oncology : official journal of the American Society of Clinical Oncology, 2010. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 32 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
32citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

32 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. Guideline
  2. Alemtuzumab for patients with chronic lymphocytic leukaemia.The Cochrane database of systematic reviews · 2012
    Pooled it
  3. Trial
  4. Trial
  5. Trial
  6. Trial
  7. Review
  8. Maintenance therapy for chronic lymphocytic leukaemia.The Cochrane database of systematic reviews · 2024
    Review
  9. Article
  10. Review
  11. Review
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Review
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Review
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors.

Thomas S LinThe Ohio State University, Columbus, OH 43210, USA.
Kathleen A Donohue
John C Byrd
Margaret S Lucas
Eva E Hoke
Elizabeth M Bengtson
Kanti R Rai
James N Atkins
Brian K Link
Richard A Larson

Funding

CANCER AND LEUKEMIA GROUP B MINORITY SATELLITE SUPPLEMENU10CA031946 · NCI · UNIVERSITY OF CHICAGO · PI BERTAGNOLLI, MONICA M · 1985 to 2013
$158.4M
CANCER &LEUKEMIA GROUP B STATISTICAL CENTERU10CA033601 · NCI · UNIVERSITY OF NEBRASKA MEDICAL CENTER · PI SARGENT, DANIEL J. · 1985 to 2013
$69.4M
Molecular Markers: Response to Chemo-immunotherapy in CLR21CA101332 · NCI · OHIO STATE UNIVERSITY · PI BYRD, JOHN C · 2004 to 2005
$564k
NCI NIH HHS CA31946NCI NIH HHS CA33601NCI NIH HHS R21 CA101332NCI NIH HHS R21CA101332NCI NIH HHS U10 CA031946NCI NIH HHS U10 CA033601
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

purposeTo determine if alemtuzumab consolidation improves response rate and progression-free survival (PFS) after induction chemoimmunotherapy in previously untreated symptomatic patients with chronic lymphocytic leukemia. PATIENTS AND

methodsPatients (n = 102) received fludarabine 25 mg/m(2) intravenously days 1 to 5 and rituximab 50 mg/m(2) day 1, 325 mg/m(2) day 3, and 375 mg/m(2) day 5 of cycle 1 and then 375 mg/m(2) day 1 of cycles 2 to 6; fludarabine plus rituximab (FR) administration was repeated every 28 days for six cycles. Three months after completion of FR, patients with stable disease or better response received subcutaneous alemtuzumab 3 mg day 1, 10 mg day 3, and 30 mg day 5 and then 30 mg three times per week for 5 weeks.

resultsOverall response (OR), complete response (CR), and partial response (PR) rates were 90%, 29%, and 61% after FR, respectively; 15% of patients were minimal residual disease (MRD) negative. Of 102 patients, 58 received alemtuzumab; 28 (61%) of 46 patients achieving PR after FR attained CR after alemtuzumab. By intent to treat (n = 102), OR and CR rates were 90% and 57% after alemtuzumab, respectively; 42% of patients became MRD negative. With median follow-up of 36 months, median PFS was 36 months, 2-year PFS was 72%, and 2-year OS was 86%. In patients achieving CR after FR, alemtuzumab was associated with five deaths resulting from infection (viral and Listeria meningitis and Legionella, cytomegalovirus, and Pneumocystis pneumonias), which occurred up to 7 months after last therapy. The study was amended to exclude CR patients from receiving alemtuzumab.

conclusionAlemtuzumab consolidation improved CR and MRD-negative rates after FR induction but caused serious infections in patients who had already achieved CR after induction and did not improve 2-year PFS or survival.

Indexed as

AdultAgedAged, 80 and overAlemtuzumabAnemiaAntibodies, MonoclonalAntibodies, Monoclonal, HumanizedAntibodies, Monoclonal, Murine-DerivedAntibodies, NeoplasmAntineoplastic Combined Chemotherapy ProtocolsDisease-Free SurvivalDrug Administration ScheduleFatigueFemaleHumansInjections, SubcutaneousAlemtuzumabAntibodies, MonoclonalAntibodies, Monoclonal, HumanizedAntibodies, Monoclonal, Murine-DerivedAntibodies, NeoplasmfludarabineRituximabVidarabine

Identifiers

PMID20697069
PMCPMC2988639

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.