Evidence map›Paper›PMID 20697009›Full record

ArticleArchives of ophthalmology (Chicago, Ill. : 1960)2010

Optic nerve regeneration.

Larry I Benowitz, Yuqin Yin

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Archives of ophthalmology (Chicago, Ill. : 1960), 2010. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 36 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
36citing papers in PubMed
2.4field-weighted citation impact, top 11% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

36 citing papers in PubMed, 73 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Randomized Controlled Phase 2a Study of RPh201 in Previous Nonarteritic Anterior Ischemic Optic Neuropathy.Journal of neuro-ophthalmology : the official journal of the North American Neuro-Ophthalmology Society · 2019
    Trial
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Review
  13. Review
  14. Review
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Review
  18. Oncomodulin: The Enigmatic Parvalbumin Protein.Frontiers in molecular neuroscience · 2019
    Article
  19. Review
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Larry I BenowitzF.M. Kirby Neurobiology Center, Children's Hospital Boston, Department of Surgery, Harvard Medical School, Massachusetts, USA. larry.benowitz@childrens.harvard.edu
Yuqin Yin
Boston Children's Hospital · US

Funding

MOLECULAR BASES OF NEURONAL CONNECTIVITYR01EY005690 · NEI · MC LEAN HOSPITAL (BELMONT, MA) · PI BENOWITZ, LARRY IRA · 1985 to 2012
$4.7M
NEI NIH HHS EY05690NEI NIH HHS R01 EY005690
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Retinal ganglion cells are usually not able to regenerate their axons after optic nerve injury or degenerative disorders, resulting in lifelong visual loss. This situation can be partially reversed by activating the intrinsic growth state of retinal ganglion cells, maintaining their viability, and counteracting inhibitory signals in the extracellular environment. Advances during the past few years continue to extend the amount of regeneration that can be achieved in animal models. These findings give hope that clinically meaningful regeneration may become a reality within a few years if regenerating axons can be guided to their appropriate destinations.

Indexed as

AnimalsAxonsCalcium-Binding ProteinsCyclic AMPHumansMannoseNerve RegenerationOptic NerveOptic Nerve InjuriesRetinal Ganglion CellsCalcium-Binding ProteinsCyclic AMPMannoseoncomodulin

Identifiers

PMID20697009
PMCPMC3072887
OpenAlexW2129839617

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.