Evidence map›Paper›PMID 20696661›Full record

ArticleCancer epidemiology, biomarkers & prevention : a publication of the American Association for Cancer Research, cosponsored by the American Society of Preventive Oncology2010

Use of folic acid-containing supplements after a diagnosis of colorectal cancer in the Colon Cancer Family Registry.

Rebecca S Holmes, Yingye Zheng, John A Baron, Lin Li, Gail McKeown-Eyssen, Polly A Newcomb, Mariana C Stern, Robert W Haile, William M Grady, John D Potter and 8 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Cancer epidemiology, biomarkers & prevention : a publication of the American Association for Cancer Research, cosponsored by the American Society of Preventive Oncology, 2010. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 12 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
12citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

12 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Opportunities and challenges for selected emerging technologies in cancer epidemiology: mitochondrial, epigenomic, metabolomic, and telomerase profiling.Cancer epidemiology, biomarkers & prevention : a publication of the American Association for Cancer Research, cosponsored by the American Society of Preventive Oncology · 2013
    Review
  11. Review
  12. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

18 authors.

Rebecca S HolmesNational Center for Tumor Diseases Heidelberg, Division of Preventive Oncology, German Cancer Research Center, Im Neuenheimer Feld 581, Heidelberg, Germany.
Yingye Zheng
John A Baron
Lin Li
Gail McKeown-Eyssen
Polly A Newcomb
Mariana C Stern
Robert W Haile
William M Grady
John D Potter
Loic Le Marchand
Peter T Campbell
Jane C Figueiredo
Paul J Limburg
Mark A Jenkins
John L Hopper
Cornelia M Ulrich
Colon Cancer Family Registry

Funding

USC Consortium:Colorectal Cancer Family RegistryU01CA074799 · NCI · UNIVERSITY OF SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA · PI HAILE, ROBERT WILLIAM · 1997 to 2008
$20.4M
SEATTLE FAMILIAL COLORECTAL CANCER REGISTRYU01CA074794 · NCI · FRED HUTCHINSON CANCER RESEARCH CENTER · PI NEWCOMB, POLLY A · 1997 to 2007
$14.1M
ONTARIO REGISTRY FOR STUDIES OF FAMILIAL COLON CANCERU01CA074783 · NCI · CANCER CARE ONTARIO · PI GALLINGER, STEVEN · 1997 to 2008
$12.5M
FAMILIAL COLORECTAL NEOPLASIA COLLABORATIVE GROUPU01CA074800 · NCI · MAYO CLINIC ROCHESTER · PI LINDOR, NORALANE MOREY · 1997 to 2007
$9.1M
Cancer Prevention Trng-Nutrition, Exercise &GeneticsR25CA094880 · NCI · UNIVERSITY OF WASHINGTON · PI WHITE, EMILY · 2002 to 2016
$7.3M
The Colon Cancer Family Registry: SeattleU24CA074794 · NCI · FRED HUTCHINSON CANCER RESEARCH CENTER · PI NEWCOMB, POLLY A · 2008 to 2011
$7.0M
AUSTRALASIAN COLORECTAL CANCER FAMILY REGISTRYU01CA097735 · NCI · UNIVERSITY OF MELBOURNE · PI HOPPER, JOHN L · 2002 to 2007
$6.9M
HAWAII FAMILY REGISTRY OF COLON CANCERU01CA074806 · NCI · UNIVERSITY OF HAWAII AT MANOA · PI LE MARCHAND, LOIC · 1997 to 2008
$6.1M
NCI CFRBCCS INFORMATICS CENTER AT UCIU01CA078296 · NCI · UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA IRVINE · PI ANTON-CULVER, HODA A. · 1998 to 2005
$5.2M
UNIVERSITY OF WASHINGTON GI TRAINING GRANTT32DK007742 · NIDDK · UNIVERSITY OF WASHINGTON · PI GRADY, WILLIAM MALLORY · 1996 to 2022
$4.7M
NSAID and COX/PG Metabolism and Colorectal CancerR01CA112516 · NCI · FRED HUTCHINSON CANCER RESEARCH CENTER · PI ULRICH, CORNELIA M · 2005 to 2009
$3.6M
A Prospective Study of Colorectal Cancer: One-Carbon Metabolism and InflammationR01CA120523 · NCI · FRED HUTCHINSON CANCER RESEARCH CENTER · PI ULRICH, CORNELIA M · 2008 to 2012
$3.0M
NCI NIH HHS CA-95011NCI NIH HHS R01 CA105437NCI NIH HHS R01 CA112516NCI NIH HHS R01 CA120523NCI NIH HHS R25 CA094880NCI NIH HHS R25CA94880NCI NIH HHS U01 CA074783NCI NIH HHS U01 CA074794NCI NIH HHS U01 CA074799NCI NIH HHS U01 CA074800NCI NIH HHS U01 CA074806NCI NIH HHS U01 CA078296NCI NIH HHS U01 CA097735NCI NIH HHS U24 CA074794NIDDK NIH HHS 5T32DK007742NIDDK NIH HHS T32 DK007742PHS HHS R01C105437
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundSupplement use among cancer patients is high, and folic acid intake in particular may adversely affect the progression of colorectal cancer. Few studies have evaluated the use of folic acid-containing supplements (FAS) and its predictors in colorectal cancer patients.

objectiveTo assess the use of FAS, change in use, and its predictors after colorectal cancer diagnosis.

designWe used logistic regression models to investigate predictors of FAS use and its initiation after colorectal cancer diagnosis in 1,092 patients recruited through the Colon Cancer Family Registry.

resultsThe prevalence of FAS use was 35.4% before and 55.1% after colorectal cancer diagnosis (P = 0.004). Women were more likely than men to use FAS after diagnosis [odds ratio (OR), 1.47; 95% confidence interval (95% CI), 1.14-1.89], as were those consuming more fruit (P(trend) < 0.0001) or vegetables (P(trend) = 0.001), and U.S. residents (P < 0.0001). Less likely to use FAS after diagnosis were nonwhite patients (OR, 0.66; 95% CI, 0.45-0.97), current smokers (OR, 0.67; 95% CI, 0.46-0.96), and those with higher meat intake (P(trend) = 0.03). Predictors of FAS initiation after diagnosis were generally similar to those of FAS use after diagnosis, although associations with race and vegetable intake were weaker and those with exercise stronger.

conclusionsOur analysis showed substantial increases in the use of FAS after diagnosis with colorectal cancer, with use or initiation more likely among women, Caucasians, U.S. residents, and those with a health-promoting life-style. IMPACT: Studies of cancer prognosis that rely on prediagnostic exposure information may result in substantial misclassification.

Indexed as

Antineoplastic AgentsColorectal NeoplasmsDietary SupplementsFamily HealthFemaleFolic AcidFollow-Up StudiesHealth BehaviorHumansMaleMiddle AgedPatient Acceptance of Health CarePrognosisRegistriesSex FactorsSurveys and QuestionnairesAntineoplastic AgentsFolic Acid

Identifiers

PMID20696661
PMCPMC3523172

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.