Evidence map›Paper›PMID 20696374›Full record

ArticleNeuron2010

A custody battle for the mind: evidence for extensive imprinting in the brain.

Jessica Tollkuhn, Xiaohong Xu, Nirao M Shah

Abstract readComment
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Neuron, 2010. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
5citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

5 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Epigenetics, autism spectrum, and neurodevelopmental disorders.Neurotherapeutics : the journal of the American Society for Experimental NeuroTherapeutics · 2013
    Review
  4. Article
  5. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Jessica TollkuhnDepartment of Anatomy, University of California, San Francisco, MC 2722, CA 94158, USA.
Xiaohong Xu
Nirao M Shah

Funding

Dissecting the neural control of social attachmentDP1OD006425 · OD · UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA, SAN FRANCISCO · PI SHAH, NIRAO MAHESH · 2009 to 2011
$2.3M
NIH HHS DP1 OD006425
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Relatively few genes (approximately 100) have previously been shown to be imprinted such that their expression in progeny derives from either the maternal or paternal copy. Two recent studies by Gregg et al. (2010a, 2010b) in Science expand this list by an order of magnitude, revealing complex patterns of parent-of-origin bias in gene expression in the brain that are developmentally and regionally restricted, and in many cases, sexually dimorphic.

Identifiers

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.