Evidence map›Paper›PMID 20696230›Full record

ArticleHearing research2010

Noise-induced hearing loss alters the temporal dynamics of auditory-nerve responses.

Ryan E Scheidt, Sushrut Kale, Michael G Heinz

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Hearing research, 2010. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 27 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
27citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

27 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Age-Related Deficits in Binaural Hearing: Contribution of Peripheral and Central Effects.The Journal of neuroscience : the official journal of the Society for Neuroscience · 2024
    Article
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Adaptation in auditory processing.Physiological reviews · 2023
    Review
  6. Article
  7. The role of GABAFrontiers in endocrinology · 2023
    Review
  8. Distorted Tonotopy Severely Degrades Neural Representations of Connected Speech in Noise following Acoustic Trauma.The Journal of neuroscience : the official journal of the Society for Neuroscience · 2022
    Article
  9. The chinchilla animal model for hearing science and noise-induced hearing loss.The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America · 2019
    Review
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Computational modeling of individual differences in behavioral estimates of cochlear nonlinearities.Journal of the Association for Research in Otolaryngology : JARO · 2014
    Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Physiological, anatomical, and behavioral changes after acoustic trauma in Drosophila melanogaster.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2013
    Article
  20. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Ryan E ScheidtSchool of Electrical and Computer Engineering, Purdue University, West Lafayette, IN 47907, USA.
Sushrut Kale
Michael G Heinz

Funding

Effects of Sensorineural Hearing Loss on Robust Speech CodingR01DC009838 · NIDCD · PURDUE UNIVERSITY · PI Michael G Heinz · 2009 to 2026
$6.1M
Effects of sensorineural loss on robust speech codingR03DC007348 · NIDCD · PURDUE UNIVERSITY WEST LAFAYETTE · PI HEINZ, MICHAEL G. · 2005 to 2007
$217k
NIDCD NIH HHS R01 DC009838NIDCD NIH HHS R01DC009838NIDCD NIH HHS R03 DC007348NIDCD NIH HHS R03DC07348
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Auditory-nerve fibers demonstrate dynamic response properties in that they adapt to rapid changes in sound level, both at the onset and offset of a sound. These dynamic response properties affect temporal coding of stimulus modulations that are perceptually relevant for many sounds such as speech and music. Temporal dynamics have been well characterized in auditory-nerve fibers from normal-hearing animals, but little is known about the effects of sensorineural hearing loss on these dynamics. This study examined the effects of noise-induced hearing loss on the temporal dynamics in auditory-nerve fiber responses from anesthetized chinchillas. Post-stimulus-time histograms were computed from responses to 50-ms tones presented at characteristic frequency and 30 dB above fiber threshold. Several response metrics related to temporal dynamics were computed from post-stimulus-time histograms and were compared between normal-hearing and noise-exposed animals. Results indicate that noise-exposed auditory-nerve fibers show significantly reduced response latency, increased onset response and percent adaptation, faster adaptation after onset, and slower recovery after offset. The decrease in response latency only occurred in noise-exposed fibers with significantly reduced frequency selectivity. These changes in temporal dynamics have important implications for temporal envelope coding in hearing-impaired ears, as well as for the design of dynamic compression algorithms for hearing aids.

Indexed as

Acoustic StimulationAdaptation, PhysiologicalAlgorithmsAnimalsChinchillaCochlear NerveHearing Loss, Noise-InducedMaleModels, AnimalNerve FibersReaction TimeTime Factors

Identifiers

PMID20696230
PMCPMC2934744

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.