Evidence map›Paper›PMID 20696070›Full record

Trial reportBMC public health2010

'BeSAFE', effect-evaluation of internet-based, tailored safety information combined with personal counselling on parents' child safety behaviours: study design of a randomized controlled trial.

Mirjam E J van Beelen, Tinneke M J Beirens, Mirjam K Struijk, Paul den Hertog, Anke Oenema, Eduard F van Beeck, Hein Raat

Open access · goldAbstract readRandomized Controlled Trial
In one paragraph

Trial report in BMC public health, 2010. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 13 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
13citing papers in PubMed
2.1field-weighted citation impact, top 12% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

13 citing papers in PubMed, 19 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Trial
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Review
  5. The Generation R Study: design and cohort update 2017.European journal of epidemiology · 2016
    Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Correlates of unsupervised bathing of infants: a cross-sectional study.International journal of environmental research and public health · 2013
    Article
  10. Article
  11. The Generation R Study: design and cohort update 2012.European journal of epidemiology · 2012
    Article
  12. Article
  13. Reach of a kiosk-based pediatric injury prevention program.Translational behavioral medicine · 2011
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.

Mirjam E J van BeelenDepartment of Public Health, Erasmus MC - University Medical Centre Rotterdam, PO BOX 2040, 3000 CA Rotterdam, the Netherlands. m.vanbeelen@erasmusmc.nl
Tinneke M J Beirens
Mirjam K Struijk
Paul den Hertog
Anke Oenema
Eduard F van Beeck
Hein Raat
Erasmus MC · NLErasmus University Rotterdam · NLVeiligheidNL · NL

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundInjuries in or around the home are the most important cause of death among children aged 0-4 years old. It is also a major source of morbidity and loss of quality of life. In order to reduce the number of injuries, the Consumer Safety Institute introduced the use of Safety Information Leaflets in the Netherlands to provide safety education to parents of children aged 0-4 years. Despite current safety education, necessary safety behaviours are still not taken by a large number of parents, causing unnecessary risk of injury among young children. In an earlier study an E-health module with internet-based, tailored safety information was developed and applied. It concerns an advice for parents on safety behaviours in their homes regarding their child. The aim of this study is to evaluate the effect of this safety information combined with personal counselling on parents' child safety behaviours. METHODS/

designParents who are eligible for the regular well-child visit with their child at child age 5-8 months are invited to participate in this study. Participating parents are randomized into one of two groups: 1) internet-based, tailored safety information combined with personal counselling (intervention group), or 2) personal counselling using the Safety Information Leaflets of the Consumer Safety Institute in the Netherlands for children aged 12 to 24 months (control group). All parents receive safety information on safety topics regarding the prevention of falling, poisoning, drowning and burning. Parents of the intervention group will access the internet-based, tailored safety information module when their child is approximately 10 months old. After completion of the assessment questions, the program compiles a tailored safety advice. The parents are asked to devise and inscribe a personal implementation intention. During the next well-child visit, the Child Health Clinic professional will discuss this tailored safety information and the implementation intention with the parents. The control group will receive usual care, i.e. the provision of Safety Information Leaflets during their well-child visit at the child's age of 11 months. DISCUSSION: It is hypothesized that the intervention, internet-based, tailored safety information combined with personal counselling results in more parents' child safety behaviours.

trial registrationCurrent Controlled Trials NTR1836.

Indexed as

CounselingParentingRisk Reduction BehaviorSafetyChild, PreschoolEducationHumansInfantInternetProgram EvaluationSurveys and Questionnaires

Identifiers

PMID20696070
PMCPMC2924290
OpenAlexW2123079508

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.