ArticleBMC bioinformatics2010
FACT: functional annotation transfer between proteins with similar feature architectures.
Article in BMC bioinformatics, 2010. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 14 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
14 citing papers in PubMed, 33 citations in OpenAlex.
- A Multi-level Perspective on the Evolution of Orthologs and Their Functions.Journal of molecular evolution · 2025Review
- PDGFRA is a conserved HAND2 effector during early cardiac development.Nature cardiovascular research · 2024Article
- FAS: assessing the similarity between proteins using multi-layered feature architectures.Bioinformatics (Oxford, England) · 2023Article
- Tracing Eukaryotic Ribosome Biogenesis Factors Into the Archaeal Domain Sheds Light on the Evolution of Functional Complexity.Frontiers in microbiology · 2021Article
- Adjustment of photosynthetic activity to drought and fluctuating light in wheat.Plant, cell & environment · 2020Article
- Makorin 1 controls embryonic patterning by alleviating Bruno1-mediated repression of oskar translation.PLoS genetics · 2020Article
- The RNA-binding ubiquitin ligase MKRN1 functions in ribosome-associated quality control of poly(A) translation.Genome biology · 2019Article
- Inferring bona fide transfrags in RNA-Seq derived-transcriptome assemblies of non-model organisms.BMC bioinformatics · 2015Article
- Innate immune response to Streptococcus pyogenes depends on the combined activation of TLR13 and TLR2.PloS one · 2015Article
- The evolution of the ribosome biogenesis pathway from a yeast perspective.Nucleic acids research · 2014Article
- Mus81 nuclease and Sgs1 helicase are essential for meiotic recombination in a protist lacking a synaptonemal complex.Nucleic acids research · 2013Article
- Enzyme reaction annotation using cloud techniques.BioMed research international · 2013Article
- An analysis of single amino acid repeats as use case for application specific background models.BMC bioinformatics · 2011Article
- Zygomycetes, microsporidia, and the evolutionary ancestry of sex determination.Genome biology and evolution · 2011Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundThe increasing number of sequenced genomes provides the basis for exploring the genetic and functional diversity within the tree of life. Only a tiny fraction of the encoded proteins undergoes a thorough experimental characterization. For the remainder, bioinformatics annotation tools are the only means to infer their function. Exploiting significant sequence similarities to already characterized proteins, commonly taken as evidence for homology, is the prevalent method to deduce functional equivalence. Such methods fail when homologs are too diverged, or when they have assumed a different function. Finally, due to convergent evolution, functional equivalence is not necessarily linked to common ancestry. Therefore complementary approaches are required to identify functional equivalents.
resultsWe present the Feature Architecture Comparison Tool http://www.cibiv.at/FACT to search for functionally equivalent proteins. FACT uses the similarity between feature architectures of two proteins, i.e., the arrangements of functional domains, secondary structure elements and compositional properties, as a proxy for their functional equivalence. A scoring function measures feature architecture similarities, which enables searching for functional equivalents in entire proteomes. Our evaluation of 9,570 EC classified enzymes revealed that FACT, using the full feature, set outperformed the existing architecture-based approaches by identifying significantly more functional equivalents as highest scoring proteins. We show that FACT can identify functional equivalents that share no significant sequence similarity. However, when the highest scoring protein of FACT is also the protein with the highest local sequence similarity, it is in 99% of the cases functionally equivalent to the query. We demonstrate the versatility of FACT by identifying a missing link in the yeast glutathione metabolism and also by searching for the human GolgA5 equivalent in Trypanosoma brucei.
conclusionsFACT facilitates a quick and sensitive search for functionally equivalent proteins in entire proteomes. FACT is complementary to approaches using sequence similarity to identify proteins with the same function. Thus, FACT is particularly useful when functional equivalents need to be identified in evolutionarily distant species, or when functional equivalents are not homologous. The most reliable annotation transfers, however, are achieved when feature architecture similarity and sequence similarity are jointly taken into account.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.