Evidence map›Paper›PMID 20694513›Full record

ArticleDigestive diseases and sciences2011

MCM-2 and MCM-5 expression in gastric adenocarcinoma: clinical significance and comparison with Ki-67 proliferative marker.

Constantinos Giaginis, Athina Giagini, Gerasimos Tsourouflis, Elisavet Gatzidou, Emmanuel Agapitos, Gregorios Kouraklis, Stamatios Theocharis

Abstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Digestive diseases and sciences, 2011. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 35 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
35citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

35 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. MCM8 promotes lung cancer progression through upregulating DNAJC10.Journal of cellular and molecular medicine · 2024
    Article
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Expression Profile and Prognostic Values of Mini-Chromosome Maintenance Families (MCMs) in Breast Cancer.Medical science monitor : international medical journal of experimental and clinical research · 2020
    Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Constantinos GiaginisDepartment of Forensic Medicine and Toxicology, Medical School, University of Athens, 75 Mikras Asias Street, 11527, Athens, Greece. cgiaginis@yahoo.gr
Athina Giagini
Gerasimos Tsourouflis
Elisavet Gatzidou
Emmanuel Agapitos
Gregorios Kouraklis
Stamatios Theocharis

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundMinichromosome maintenance (MCM) proteins are essential components of DNA replication, being related to cell proliferation, and serve as useful biomarkers for cancer screening, surveillance and prognosis. The aim of the present study was to evaluate the clinical significance of MCM-2 and MCM-5 expression in gastric adenocarcinoma in comparison with Ki-67 proliferative marker.

methodsMCM-2, MCM-5 and Ki-67 expression was assessed immunohistochemically in 66 tumoral samples of gastric adenocarcinoma patients and was statistically analyzed in relation to clinicopathological characteristics and patient survival.

resultsMCM-2 expression did not show significant associations with any clinicopathological parameters, while Ki-67 expression was merely significantly associated with tumor size (P = 0.0150). MCM-2 and Ki-67 expression were more frequently in intestinal (median values: 67.5 and 60%) compared to diffuse-type (median values: 60 and 45%) gastric adenocarcinoma cases without though reaching statistical significance (P > 0.05). MCM-5 expression was significantly associated with tumor size (P = 0.0295), presence of lymph node metastases (P = 0.0216) and tumor histopathological stage (P = 0.0098). Patients presenting high MCM-5 expression had significantly shorter survival times (log-rank test, P = 0.0042), whereas neither MCM-2 nor Ki-67 expression showed significant prognostic value (log-rank test, P = 0.9618 and P = 0.7174, respectively). In multivariate analysis, patient age, histopathological stage and grade of differentiation, but not MCM-5 expression, were identified as independent prognostic factors (Cox regression analysis, P = 0.0097, P = 0.0195, P = 0.0035 and P = 0.3245, respectively).

conclusionsThe present study showed that MCM-5 expression was associated with clinicopathological parameters in gastric adenocarcinoma. However, further studies highlighting the distinct impact of the two histopathological types, intestinal and diffuse, are warranted to delineate whether MCMs could be used as diagnostic and prognostic markers in gastric neoplasia.

Indexed as

AdenocarcinomaAgedBiomarkers, TumorCell Cycle ProteinsCell ProliferationFemaleHumansImmunohistochemistryKi-67 AntigenMaleMiddle AgedMinichromosome Maintenance Complex Component 2Nuclear ProteinsPrognosisStomach NeoplasmsBiomarkers, TumorCell Cycle ProteinsKi-67 AntigenMCM2 protein, humanMCM5 protein, humanMinichromosome Maintenance Complex Component 2Nuclear Proteins

Identifiers

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.