Evidence map›Paper›PMID 20693725›Full record

ArticleJournal of health care for the poor and underserved2010

Using a community partnered participatory research approach to implement a randomized controlled trial: planning community partners in care.

Bowen Chung, Loretta Jones, Elizabeth L Dixon, Jeanne Miranda, Kenneth Wells, Community Partners in Care Steering Council

Registry-linked trialAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of health care for the poor and underserved, 2010. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT01699789 (CPIC is a Community Partnered Participatory Research), which is not on this map. Cited by 75 papers, 7 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
75citing papers in PubMed, 7 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT01699789 nacompletednot on this map

CPIC is a Community Partnered Participatory Research (CPPR) Project of Community and Academic Partners Working Together to Learn the Best Way to Reduce Depression in Our Communities.

TypeinterventionalSponsorRANDRan2009 to 2016Enrolled1,246ConditionsDepression, Information Dissemination, Social Determinants of HealthArmsQuality Improvement Program, Resources for Services Expert Team, Community Engagement and Planning Council
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

75 citing papers in PubMed, 7 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. Pooled it
  5. Pooled it
  6. Pooled it
  7. Collaborative care for depression and anxiety problems.The Cochrane database of systematic reviews · 2012
    Pooled it
  8. Trial
  9. Trial
  10. Trial
  11. Trial
  12. Trial
  13. Trial
  14. Trial
  15. Trial
  16. Trial
  17. Trial
  18. Trial
  19. Trial
  20. Trial

15 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Bowen ChungRAND Corporation, Santa Monica, CA 90509, USA. bchung@mednet.ucla.edu
Loretta Jones
Elizabeth L Dixon
Jeanne Miranda
Kenneth Wells
Community Partners in Care Steering Council

Funding

COMMUNITY PARTNERS IN CARER01MH078853 · NIMH · RAND CORPORATION · PI WELLS, KENNETH B. · 2007 to 2011
$6.0M
NIMH NIH HHS R01 MH078853
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

summaryQuality improvement (QI) for depression in primary care can reduce disparities in outcomes. We describe how community-partnered participatory research was used to design Community Partners in Care, a randomized trial of community engagement to activate a multiple-agency network versus support for individual agencies to implement depression QI in underserved communities.

Indexed as

Interinstitutional RelationsCommunity-Based Participatory ResearchCommunity Mental Health ServicesCooperative BehaviorDepressionHumansLos AngelesMedically Underserved AreaMinority GroupsPrimary Health CareQuality Assurance, Health CareRandomized Controlled Trials as Topic

Identifiers

PMID20693725
PMCPMC2962454

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.