Evidence map›Paper›PMID 20693516›Full record

ArticleQualitative health research2011

Women's experience of group prenatal care.

Gina Novick, Lois S Sadler, Holly Powell Kennedy, Sally S Cohen, Nora E Groce, Kathleen A Knafl

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Qualitative health research, 2011. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 42 papers, 4 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
42citing papers in PubMed, 4 pooled it
4.8field-weighted citation impact, top 6% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

42 citing papers in PubMed, 4 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 97 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. Group versus conventional antenatal care for women.The Cochrane database of systematic reviews · 2015
    Pooled it
  5. Trial
  6. Trial
  7. Trial
  8. Trial
  9. Trial
  10. Article
  11. Review
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 4 institutions in 2 countries.

Gina NovickYale University, School of Nursing, New Haven, Connecticut 06536-0740, USA. gina.novick@yale.edu
Lois S Sadler
Holly Powell Kennedy
Sally S Cohen
Nora E Groce
Kathleen A Knafl
Yale University · USUniversity College London · GBUniversity of New Mexico · USUniversity of North Carolina at Chapel Hill · US

Funding

Research Training: Self and Family ManagementT32NR008346 · NINR · YALE UNIVERSITY · PI GREY, MARGARET · 2003 to 2018
$4.7M
Women's Experience of Group Prenatal CareF31NR009911 · NINR · YALE UNIVERSITY · PI NOVICK, GINA B · 2006 to 2008
$98k
NINR NIH HHS F31 NR009911NINR NIH HHS F31NR009911NINR NIH HHS T-32 NR008346NINR NIH HHS T32 NR008346
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Group prenatal care (GPNC) is an innovative alternative to individual prenatal care. In this longitudinal study we used ethnographic methods to explore African American and Hispanic women's experiences of receiving GPNC in two urban clinics. Methods included individual, in-depth, semistructured interviews of women and group leaders in GPNC, participant observation of GPNC sessions, and medical record review. GPNC offered positive experiences and met many of women's expressed preferences regarding prenatal care. Six themes were identified, which represented separate aspects of women's experiences: investment, collaborative venture, a social gathering, relationships with boundaries, learning in the group, and changing self. Taken together, the themes conveyed the overall experience of GPNC. Women were especially enthusiastic about learning in groups, about their relationships with group leaders, and about having their pregnancy-related changes and fears normalized; however, there were also important boundaries on relationships between participants, and some women wished for greater privacy during physical examinations.

Indexed as

Group ProcessesPatient SatisfactionAdolescentAdultFemaleHumansPregnancyPregnant PeoplePrenatal CareSocioeconomic FactorsUnited StatesUrban HealthYoung Adult

Identifiers

PMID20693516
PMCPMC3085399
OpenAlexW2098626114

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.