ArticleWestern journal of nursing research2010
Cool, but is it credible? Adolescents' and parents' approaches to genetic testing.
Article in Western journal of nursing research, 2010. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 11 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
11 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 23 citations in OpenAlex.
- The role of race and ethnicity in views toward and participation in genetic studies and precision medicine research in the United States: A systematic review of qualitative and quantitative studies.Molecular genetics & genomic medicine · 2020Pooled it
- Do Children Think it is Important to Predict Learning and Behaviour Problems, and Do They Think Genetic Screening Has a Role to Play in This?Journal of autism and developmental disorders · 2024Article
- Genomic Health Literacy Interventions in Pediatrics: Scoping Review.Journal of medical Internet research · 2021Article
- Increasing genomic literacy among adolescents.Genetics in medicine : official journal of the American College of Medical Genetics · 2019Article
- Should Genetic Testing be Offered for Children? The Perspectives of Adolescents and Emerging Adults in Families with Li-Fraumeni Syndrome.Journal of genetic counseling · 2017Article
- The Precision Medicine Nation.The Hastings Center report · 2017Article
- Parents' Understanding of Genetics and Heritability.Journal of genetic counseling · 2017Article
- Psychiatric Genetics in Child Custody Proceedings: Ethical, Legal, and Social Issues.Current genetic medicine reports · 2016Article
- Honey, I Sequenced the Kids: Preventive Genomics and the Complexities of Adolescence.The American journal of bioethics : AJOB · 2015Article
- Segmenting by risk perceptions: predicting young adults' genetic-belief profiles with health and opinion-leader covariates.Health communication · 2014Article
- Behavioral Genetics in Criminal and Civil Courts.Harvard review of psychiatryReview
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
Abstract
Advances in genomic science create both opportunities and challenges for future generations. Both adolescents and adults may benefit or be harmed by decisions they make in response to this new science. Using a qualitative descriptive design, the authors interviewed 22 adolescents (11 who were aged 14-17 years and 11 who were 18-21 years) and 11 parents to determine levels of knowledge and approaches to decision making. It was found that younger adolescents and their parents have very limited knowledge about genetics and genetic testing. Older adolescents have more complete information and consider a broader range of points in making decisions about hypothetical situations involving genetic testing. Adolescents and parents need much more information to enhance their ability to make decisions about using genetic services. These findings have implications for developing interventions and public health policy highlighted by the need for improved education about the benefits and harms of genetic testing.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.