Evidence map›Paper›PMID 20691996›Full record

ArticleThe Journal of surgical research2010

Overexpression of COX-2 in celecoxib-resistant breast cancer cell lines.

Balraj Singh, LaTashia R Irving, Karen Tai, Anthony Lucci

Open access · greenAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in The Journal of surgical research, 2010. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 10 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
10citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
1.9field-weighted citation impact, top 16% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

10 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 26 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Celecoxib in breast cancer prevention and therapy.Cancer management and research · 2018
    Review
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Balraj SinghDepartment of Surgical Oncology, The University of Texas M. D. Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, Texas 77030, USA.
LaTashia R Irving
Karen Tai
Anthony Lucci
The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center · USSociety of Surgical Oncology · US

Funding

Tumor Evolution and Metastasis ProgramP30CA016672 · NCI · UNIVERSITY OF TX MD ANDERSON CAN CTR · PI Scott Kopetz · 1985 to 2026
$290.8M
Role of COX-2 in breast cancer metastasis to boneR21DK067682 · NIDDK · UNIVERSITY OF TEXAS MD ANDERSON CAN CTR · PI LUCCI, ANTHONY · 2003 to 2004
$302k
NCI NIH HHS CA16672NCI NIH HHS P30 CA016672NIDDK NIH HHS R21 DK067682
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundCyclooxygenase-2 (COX-2) plays a key role in breast cancer progression and metastasis. Effective therapeutic targeting of COX-2 would require the knowledge of whether a tumor is addicted to COX-2, and if we can counter the potential resistance to anti-COX-2 therapy. Herein we tested the hypothesis that celecoxib-resistance involves selection of cancer cells that overexpress COX-2. MATERIALS AND

methodsWe selected celecoxib-resistant (CER) variants from two metastatic cell lines, SUM149 inflammatory breast cancer (IBC) cell line and MDA-MB-231-BSC60 cell line, by culturing them in the presence of celecoxib. We measured the relative levels of COX-2 protein and its network components Bcl-2, Bcl-xL, and Bax in the parental cell lines and their CER variants by Western blotting. To determine whether celecoxib resistance would increase tumorigenicity, we performed an in vitro clonogenicity assay. We determined the statistical significance of differences between the groups using the two-sample t-test.

resultsBoth the celecoxib-resistant cell lines SUM149-CER and BSC60-CER produced significantly higher levels of COX-2 protein than their parental counterparts (P < 0.05). The CER variants produced a reduced level of pro-apoptosis protein Bax (both cell lines) and increased levels of anti-apoptosis proteins Bcl-2 (BSC60) or Bcl-xL (SUM149). Importantly, the CER variants had significantly higher clonogenicity than their parental cell lines (P < 0.05). The siRNA-mediated COX-2 knockdown in SUM149-CER cell line resulted in a significant decrease in clonogenicity and in Bcl-xL and Bcl-2 protein levels, thus supporting our hypothesis.

conclusionCelecoxib-resistant variant cells present in breast cancer cell lines overexpress COX-2, which is robustly linked with survival pathways and clonogenicity. Since COX-2 is important in the variant cancer cells of aggressive nature, it represents a good therapeutic target.

Indexed as

Breast NeoplasmsCelecoxibCell Line, TumorCyclooxygenase 2Cyclooxygenase 2 InhibitorsDrug Resistance, NeoplasmFemaleHumansProto-Oncogene Proteins c-bcl-2PyrazolesSignal TransductionSulfonamidesCelecoxibCyclooxygenase 2Cyclooxygenase 2 InhibitorsProto-Oncogene Proteins c-bcl-2PTGS2 protein, humanPyrazolesSulfonamides

Identifiers

PMID20691996
PMCPMC2943002
OpenAlexW1988619797

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.