ArticleThe Journal of surgical research2010
Overexpression of COX-2 in celecoxib-resistant breast cancer cell lines.
Article in The Journal of surgical research, 2010. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 10 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
10 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 26 citations in OpenAlex.
- Clinicopathological and prognostic significance of COX-2 immunohistochemical expression in breast cancer: a meta-analysis.Oncotarget · 2017Pooled it
- A comparative study of some NSAIDs with natural products: integrating in vitro anticancer efficacy, in vivo antiulcerative effect, histochemistry, and in silico analysis.Naunyn-Schmiedeberg's archives of pharmacology · 2026Article
- Identification of MFGE8 and KLK5/7 as mediators of breast tumorigenesis and resistance to COX-2 inhibition.Breast cancer research : BCR · 2021Article
- Pathological and molecular characteristics of inflammatory breast cancer.Translational cancer research · 2019Review
- Tspan8 is expressed in breast cancer and regulates E-cadherin/catenin signalling and metastasis accompanied by increased circulating extracellular vesicles.The Journal of pathology · 2019Article
- Celecoxib in breast cancer prevention and therapy.Cancer management and research · 2018Review
- Quantitative high-throughput efficacy profiling of approved oncology drugs in inflammatory breast cancer models of acquired drug resistance and re-sensitization.Cancer letters · 2013Article
- Selection of metastatic breast cancer cells based on adaptability of their metabolic state.PloS one · 2012Article
- Targeting GLI1 expression in human inflammatory breast cancer cells enhances apoptosis and attenuates migration.British journal of cancer · 2011Article
- Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
Abstract
backgroundCyclooxygenase-2 (COX-2) plays a key role in breast cancer progression and metastasis. Effective therapeutic targeting of COX-2 would require the knowledge of whether a tumor is addicted to COX-2, and if we can counter the potential resistance to anti-COX-2 therapy. Herein we tested the hypothesis that celecoxib-resistance involves selection of cancer cells that overexpress COX-2. MATERIALS AND
methodsWe selected celecoxib-resistant (CER) variants from two metastatic cell lines, SUM149 inflammatory breast cancer (IBC) cell line and MDA-MB-231-BSC60 cell line, by culturing them in the presence of celecoxib. We measured the relative levels of COX-2 protein and its network components Bcl-2, Bcl-xL, and Bax in the parental cell lines and their CER variants by Western blotting. To determine whether celecoxib resistance would increase tumorigenicity, we performed an in vitro clonogenicity assay. We determined the statistical significance of differences between the groups using the two-sample t-test.
resultsBoth the celecoxib-resistant cell lines SUM149-CER and BSC60-CER produced significantly higher levels of COX-2 protein than their parental counterparts (P < 0.05). The CER variants produced a reduced level of pro-apoptosis protein Bax (both cell lines) and increased levels of anti-apoptosis proteins Bcl-2 (BSC60) or Bcl-xL (SUM149). Importantly, the CER variants had significantly higher clonogenicity than their parental cell lines (P < 0.05). The siRNA-mediated COX-2 knockdown in SUM149-CER cell line resulted in a significant decrease in clonogenicity and in Bcl-xL and Bcl-2 protein levels, thus supporting our hypothesis.
conclusionCelecoxib-resistant variant cells present in breast cancer cell lines overexpress COX-2, which is robustly linked with survival pathways and clonogenicity. Since COX-2 is important in the variant cancer cells of aggressive nature, it represents a good therapeutic target.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.