ArticleJournal of neuroscience methods2010
Voltage- and temperature-dependent gating of heterologously expressed channelrhodopsin-2.
Article in Journal of neuroscience methods, 2010. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 15 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
15 citing papers in PubMed.
- Experimentally informed, quantitative photocycle model of the light-gated potassium channel WiChR.Biophysical journal · 2026Article
- Characterization of the tail current of Channelrhodopsin-2 variants.Biochemistry and biophysics reports · 2024Article
- Cross-modal modulation gates nociceptive inputs in Drosophila.Current biology : CB · 2023Article
- KCa1.1 channels contribute to optogenetically driven post-stimulation silencing in cerebellar molecular layer interneurons.The Journal of general physiology · 2023Article
- Nicotinic receptor activation induces NMDA receptor independent long-term potentiation of glutamatergic signalling in hippocampal oriens interneurons.The Journal of physiology · 2021Article
- Cardiac Optogenetics in Atrial Fibrillation: Current Challenges and Future Opportunities.BioMed research international · 2020Review
- Review
- Electrophysiological Properties and Viability of Neonatal Rat Ventricular Myocyte Cultures with Inducible ChR2 Expression.Scientific reports · 2017Article
- Optogenetic versus Electrical Stimulation of Human Cardiomyocytes: Modeling Insights.Biophysical journal · 2015Article
- Optogenetics and synaptic plasticity.Acta pharmacologica Sinica · 2013Review
- Optical control of neuronal excitation and inhibition using a single opsin protein, ChR2.Scientific reports · 2013Article
- Cardiac optogenetics.American journal of physiology. Heart and circulatory physiology · 2013Review
- Computational optogenetics: empirically-derived voltage- and light-sensitive channelrhodopsin-2 model.PLoS computational biology · 2013Article
- Principles for applying optogenetic tools derived from direct comparative analysis of microbial opsins.Nature methods · 2011Article
- Stimulating cardiac muscle by light: cardiac optogenetics by cell delivery.Circulation. Arrhythmia and electrophysiology · 2011Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Channelrhodopsins are light-activated channels originally isolated from algae that are being used increasingly as tools to non-invasively stimulate neurones. Despite their widespread use some aspects of their biophysical properties have not been fully characterised. Here we report detailed investigation of the gating kinetics and voltage-dependence of ChR2 transiently expressed in HEK-293 cells. Currents were elicited using light pulses of defined duration and intensity generated by a blue LED. Datasets were gathered both at room temperature (RT, ∼22°C) and 37°C. Current responses to light rose rapidly to a peak and then desensitized to a steady state plateau. When illumination was terminated currents rapidly deactivated. Recovery from desensitization at -85 mV was slow with half-times of 1.4 and 3.1s at 37°C and ∼22°C, respectively. At both temperatures, the reversal potential of ChR2 responses was a few mV positive to 0 mV. Both the peak and plateau phases of ChR2 responses exhibited strong inward rectification with only small outward currents at positive membrane potentials. The rates of ChR2 activation, deactivation and desensitization were ∼2 times faster at 37°C than at ∼22°C. Both the activation and deactivation kinetics of ChR2 were significantly slowed by depolarization at both temperatures. Additionally, the degree of steady state desensitization was greater at more depolarized potentials. The macroscopic desensitization kinetics were not voltage-dependent, but recovery from desensitization was slowed by depolarization. These gating behaviour data provide an important basis for more detailed analysis of the properties and limitations of ChR2 use in more complex systems.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.