Evidence map›Paper›PMID 20691096›Full record

ArticleBMC genomics2010

Distributed probing of chromatin structure in vivo reveals pervasive chromatin accessibility for expressed and non-expressed genes during tissue differentiation in C. elegans.

Ky Sha, Sam G Gu, Luiz C Pantalena-Filho, Amy Goh, Jamie Fleenor, Daniel Blanchard, Chaya Krishna, Andrew Fire

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in BMC genomics, 2010. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 13 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
13citing papers in PubMed
0.6field-weighted citation impact, top 38% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

13 citing papers in PubMed, 23 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Recompleting theGenome research · 2019
    Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Epigenetic memories: structural marks or active circuits?Cellular and molecular life sciences : CMLS · 2012
    Review
  11. Review
  12. Article
  13. Dam it's good! DamID profiling of protein-DNA interactions.Wiley interdisciplinary reviews. Developmental biology
    Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.

Ky ShaDepts, of Pathology and Genetics, Stanford University School of Medicine, 300 Pasteur Drive, Palo Alto CA, USA.
Sam G Gu
Luiz C Pantalena-Filho
Amy Goh
Jamie Fleenor
Daniel Blanchard
Chaya Krishna
Andrew Fire
Johns Hopkins University · USPalo Alto University · USCarnegie Institution for Science · US

Funding

GENE REGULATION DURING EARLY DEVELOPMENT OF C. ELEGANSR01GM037706 · NIGMS · STANFORD UNIVERSITY · PI FIRE, ANDREW Z. · 1987 to 2018
$11.0M
NIGMS NIH HHS R01 GM037706NIGMS NIH HHS R01-GM37706
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundTissue differentiation is accompanied by genome-wide changes in the underlying chromatin structure and dynamics, or epigenome. By controlling when, where, and what regulatory factors have access to the underlying genomic DNA, the epigenome influences the cell's transcriptome and ultimately its function. Existing genomic methods for analyzing cell-type-specific changes in chromatin generally involve two elements: (i) a source for purified cells (or nuclei) of distinct types, and (ii) a specific treatment that partitions or degrades chromatin by activity or structural features. For many cell types of great interest, such assays are limited by our inability to isolate the relevant cell populations in an organism or complex tissue containing an intertwined mixture of other cells. This limitation has confined available knowledge of chromatin dynamics to a narrow range of biological systems (cell types that can be sorted/separated/dissected in large numbers and tissue culture models) or to amalgamations of diverse cell types (tissue chunks, whole organisms).

resultsTransgene-driven expression of DNA/chromatin modifying enzymes provides one opportunity to query chromatin structures in expression-defined cell subsets. In this work we combine in vivo expression of a bacterial DNA adenine methyltransferase (DAM) with high throughput sequencing to sample tissue-specific chromatin accessibility on a genome-wide scale. We have applied the method (DALEC: Direct Asymmetric Ligation End Capture) towards mapping a cell-type-specific view of genome accessibility as a function of differentiated state. Taking advantage of C. elegans strains expressing the DAM enzyme in diverse tissues (body wall muscle, gut, and hypodermis), our efforts yield a genome-wide dataset measuring chromatin accessibility at each of 538,000 DAM target sites in the C. elegans (diploid) genome.

conclusionsValidating the DALEC mapping results, we observe a strong association between observed coverage by nucleosomes and low DAM accessibility. Strikingly, we observed no extended regions of inaccessible chromatin for any of the tissues examined. These results are consistent with "local choreography" models in which differential gene expression is driven by intricate local rearrangements of chromatin structure rather than gross impenetrability of large chromosomal regions.

Indexed as

AnimalsCaenorhabditis elegansChromatinDNA Modification MethylasesGene Expression ProfilingGene Expression Regulation, DevelopmentalGenome, HelminthHistonesSequence Analysis, DNAChromatinDNA Modification MethylasesHistones

Identifiers

PMID20691096
PMCPMC3091661
OpenAlexW2008243338

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.