Evidence map›Paper›PMID 20690817›Full record

ReviewAnnual review of genomics and human genetics2010

Contrasting methods of quantifying fine structure of human recombination.

Andrew G Clark, Xu Wang, Tara Matise

Open access · greenAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Annual review of genomics and human genetics, 2010. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 24 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
24citing papers in PubMed
2.7field-weighted citation impact, top 9% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

24 citing papers in PubMed, 39 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Construction of PRDM9 allele-specific recombination maps in cattle using large-scale pedigree analysis and genome-wide single sperm genomics.DNA research : an international journal for rapid publication of reports on genes and genomes · 2018
    Article
  9. Article
  10. Background selection as null hypothesis in population genomics: insights and challenges fromPhilosophical transactions of the Royal Society of London. Series B, Biological sciences · 2017
    Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Recombination is associated with the evolution of genome structure and worker behavior in honey bees.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2012
    Article
  19. Article
  20. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Andrew G ClarkDepartment of Molecular Biology and Genetics, Cornell University, Ithaca, NY 14853, USA. ac347@cornell.edu
Xu Wang
Tara Matise
Cornell University · USRutgers, The State University of New Jersey · US

Funding

Variable DNA sites predicting interindividual variation in health measuresP50GM065509 · NIGMS · UNIVERSITY OF MICHIGAN AT ANN ARBOR · PI SING, CHARLES · 2001 to 2011
$27.5M
Population Genetic Inferences From Dense Genotype DataR01HG003229 · NHGRI · CORNELL UNIVERSITY ITHACA · PI BUSTAMANTE, CARLOS DANIEL, CLARK, ANDREW G · 2004 to 2013
$4.8M
The Rutgers Mapping ResourcesR01GM080221 · NIGMS · RUTGERS, THE STATE UNIV OF N.J. · PI MATISE, TARA C. · 2007 to 2010
$435k
NHGRI NIH HHS HG003229NHGRI NIH HHS R01 HG003229NIGMS NIH HHS GM065509NIGMS NIH HHS GM080221NIGMS NIH HHS P50 GM065509NIGMS NIH HHS R01 GM080221NIMH NIH HHS MH084685
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

There has been considerable excitement over the ability to construct linkage maps based only on genome-wide genotype data for single nucleotide polymorphic sites (SNPs) in a population sample. These maps, which are derived from estimates of linkage disequilibrium (LD), rely on population genetics theory to relate the decay of LD to the local rate of recombination, but other population processes also come into play. Here we contrast these LD maps to the classically derived, pedigree-based human recombination maps. The LD maps have a level of resolution greatly exceeding that of the pedigree maps, and at this fine scale, sperm typing allows a means of validation. While at a gross level both the pedigree maps and the sperm typing methods generally agree with LD maps, there are significant local differences between them, and the fact that these maps measure different genetic features should be remembered when using them for other genetic inferences.

Indexed as

Genome, HumanLinkage DisequilibriumRecombination, GeneticChromosome MappingGenetics, PopulationHumansPedigreePolymorphism, Single Nucleotide

Identifiers

PMID20690817
PMCPMC2980829
OpenAlexW2096221412

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.