Evidence map›Paper›PMID 20689977›Full record

Trial reportThe European journal of health economics : HEPAC : health economics in prevention and care2011

Cost-effectiveness of cognitive-behavioral group therapy for dysfunctional fear of progression in cancer patients.

C Sabariego, M Brach, P Herschbach, P Berg, G Stucki

Abstract readRandomized Controlled Trial
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Trial report in The European journal of health economics : HEPAC : health economics in prevention and care, 2011. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 17 papers, 5 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
17citing papers in PubMed, 5 pooled it
1.2field-weighted citation impact, top 21% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

17 citing papers in PubMed, 5 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 36 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. Pooled it
  5. Pooled it
  6. Trial
  7. Trial
  8. Trial
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Cognitive Behavior Therapy for Fear of Cancer Recurrence: A Case Study.Journal of clinical psychology in medical settings · 2018
    Article
  13. Article
  14. Prevalence and correlates of fear of recurrence among adolescent and young adult versus older adult post-treatment cancer survivors.Supportive care in cancer : official journal of the Multinational Association of Supportive Care in Cancer · 2016
    Article
  15. Article
  16. Does fear of cancer recurrence predict cancer survivors' health care use?Supportive care in cancer : official journal of the Multinational Association of Supportive Care in Cancer · 2013
    Article
  17. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors at 3 institutions in 2 countries.

C SabariegoInstitute for Health and Rehabilitation Sciences, Ludwig-Maximilians-University, Marchioninistraße 17, 81377, Munich, Germany.
M Brach
P Herschbach
P Berg
G Stucki
Ludwig-Maximilians-Universität München · DETechnical University of Munich · DEUniversity of Lucerne · CH

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Anxiety and fear are often associated with chronic conditions such as cancer. This paper targets the cost-effectiveness analysis of a cognitive-behavioral group therapy (CBT) in comparison to a client-centered, supportive-experiential group therapy (SET) in cancer patients with dysfunctional fear of progression. An incremental cost-effectiveness analysis was performed using data from a randomized controlled trial among cancer patients receiving inpatient rehabilitation. The means, 95% confidence intervals [95% CI], incremental cost-effectiveness graphic and acceptability curve were obtained from 1,000 bootstrap replications. A total of 174 patients were included in the economic evaluation. The estimated means [95% CI] of direct costs and reduction of fear of progression were <euro>9,045.03 [6,359.07; 12,091.87] and 1.41 [0.93; 1.92] for patients in the SET and <euro>6,682.78 [4,998.09; 8,440.95] and 1.44 [1.02; 1.09] for patients in the CBT. The incremental cost-effectiveness ratio [95% CI] amounts to minus <euro>78,741.66 [-154,987.20; 110,486.32] for an additional unit of effect. Given the acceptability curve, there is a 92.4% chance that the CBT, compared with the SET, is cost-effective without the need of additional costs to payers. Our main result is the superior cost-effectiveness of the cognitive-behavioral intervention program in comparison to the non-directive encounter group for our sample of cancer patients with high levels of anxiety.

Indexed as

Disease ProgressionAdultCognitive Behavioral TherapyCost-Benefit AnalysisFearFemaleGermanyHumansMaleMiddle AgedNeoplasmsSurveys and QuestionnairesTreatment Outcome

Identifiers

PMID20689977
OpenAlexW2036563533

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.