ArticleJournal of visualized experiments : JoVE2010
Primer-free aptamer selection using a random DNA library.
Article in Journal of visualized experiments : JoVE, 2010. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 10 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
10 citing papers in PubMed, 20 citations in OpenAlex.
- Integrated 'Shield-Spear' Biological Patch for Fibrosis-Free Bladder Reconstruction.Advanced science (Weinheim, Baden-Wurttemberg, Germany) · 2025Article
- Advanced cancer targeting using aptamer functionalized nanocarriers for site-specific cargo delivery.Biomaterials research · 2023Review
- A New Design for the Fixed Primer Regions in an Oligonucleotide Library for SELEX Aptamer Screening.Frontiers in chemistry · 2020Article
- Selection of aptamers for AMACR detection from DNA libraries with different primers.RSC advances · 2018Article
- Key Aspects of Nucleic Acid Library Design for in Vitro Selection.International journal of molecular sciences · 2018Review
- S100B as a Potential Biomarker and Therapeutic Target in Multiple Sclerosis.Molecular neurobiology · 2016Article
- Improved Aptamers for the Diagnosis and Potential Treatment of HER2-Positive Cancer.Pharmaceuticals (Basel, Switzerland) · 2016Article
- Aptamer Selection Technology and Recent Advances.Molecular therapy. Nucleic acids · 2015Review
- Article
- Strategies for the discovery of therapeutic aptamers.Expert opinion on drug discovery · 2011Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
Abstract
Aptamers are highly structured oligonucleotides (DNA or RNA) that can bind to targets with affinities comparable to antibodies (1). They are identified through an in vitro selection process called Systematic Evolution of Ligands by EXponential enrichment (SELEX) to recognize a wide variety of targets, from small molecules to proteins and other macromolecules (2-4). Aptamers have properties that are well suited for in vivo diagnostic and/or therapeutic applications: Besides good specificity and affinity, they are easily synthesized, survive more rigorous processing conditions, they are poorly immunogenic, and their relatively small size can result in facile penetration of tissues. Aptamers that are identified through the standard SELEX process usually comprise approximately 80 nucleotides (nt), since they are typically selected from nucleic acid libraries with approximately 40 nt long randomized regions plus fixed primer sites of approximately 20 nt on each side. The fixed primer sequences thus can comprise nearly approximately 50% of the library sequences, and therefore may positively or negatively compromise identification of aptamers in the selection process (3), although bioinformatics approaches suggest that the fixed sequences do not contribute significantly to aptamer structure after selection (5). To address these potential problems, primer sequences have been blocked by complementary oligonucleotides or switched to different sequences midway during the rounds of SELEX (6), or they have been trimmed to 6-9 nt (7, 8). Wen and Gray (9) designed a primer-free genomic SELEX method, in which the primer sequences were completely removed from the library before selection and were then regenerated to allow amplification of the selected genomic fragments. However, to employ the technique, a unique genomic library has to be constructed, which possesses limited diversity, and regeneration after rounds of selection relies on a linear reamplification step. Alternatively, efforts to circumvent problems caused by fixed primer sequences using high efficiency partitioning are met with problems regarding PCR amplification (10). We have developed a primer-free (PF) selection method that significantly simplifies SELEX procedures and effectively eliminates primer-interference problems (11, 12). The protocols work in a straightforward manner. The central random region of the library is purified without extraneous flanking sequences and is bound to a suitable target (for example to a purified protein or complex mixtures such as cell lines). Then the bound sequences are obtained, reunited with flanking sequences, and re-amplified to generate selected sub-libraries. As an example, here we selected aptamers to S100B, a protein marker for melanoma. Binding assays showed Kd s in the 10(-7) - 10(-8) M range after a few rounds of selection, and we demonstrate that the aptamers function effectively in a sandwich binding format.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.