Evidence map›Paper›PMID 20687184›Full record

ReviewThe Mount Sinai journal of medicine, New York

Pharmacokinetic/ pharmacodynamic-driven drug development.

James M Gallo

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in The Mount Sinai journal of medicine, New York. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 16 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
16citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
1.6field-weighted citation impact, top 15% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

16 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 48 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Review
  8. Frontiers in pharmacology · 2023
    Review
  9. Molecular association ofFrontiers in cellular and infection microbiology · 2023
    Review
  10. Article
  11. Review
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Review
  15. Article
  16. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

1 author at 1 institution in 1 country.

James M GalloDepartment of Pharmacology and Systems Therapeutics, Mount Sinai School of Medicine, New York, NY, USA. james.gallo@mssm.edu
Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai · US

Funding

Development of Targeted Anticancer DrugsR01CA127963 · NCI · TEMPLE UNIV OF THE COMMONWEALTH · PI GALLO, JAMES M. · 2008 to 2012
$2.0M
NCI NIH HHS CA127963NCI NIH HHS R01 CA127963
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The drug discovery and development enterprise, traditionally an industrial juggernaut, has spanned into the academic arena that is partially motivated by the National Institutes of Health Roadmap highlighting translational science and medicine. Because drug discovery and development represents a pipeline of basic to clinical investigations, it meshes well with the "bench to the bedside" prime directive of translational medicine. The renewed interest in drug discovery and development in academia provides an opportunity to rethink the hiearchary of studies with the hope of improving the staid approaches that have been criticized for lacking innovation. One area that has received limited attention concerns the use of pharmacokinetic and pharmacodynamic studies in the drug-development process. Using anticancer drug development as a focus, this review will address past and current deficencies in how pharmacokinetic/pharmacodynamic studies are conducted and offer new strategies that might bridge the gap between preclinical and clinical trials.

Indexed as

Biomedical ResearchDrug DesignPharmacokineticsPharmacological PhenomenaAntineoplastic AgentsHumansNeoplasmsPharmacogeneticsPrecision MedicineTranslational Research, BiomedicalAntineoplastic Agents

Identifiers

PMID20687184
PMCPMC2917832
OpenAlexW2096135367

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.