SynthesisThe Cochrane database of systematic reviews2010
Antibiotic therapy for Shigella dysentery.
Synthesis in The Cochrane database of systematic reviews, 2010. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 38 papers, 6 of them syntheses that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
38 citing papers in PubMed, 6 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 134 citations in OpenAlex.
- Antibiotics for acute watery or persistent with or without bloody diarrhoea in children: A systematic review and meta-analysis.Journal of global health · 2024Pooled it
- Consequences of Shigella infection in young children: a systematic review.International journal of infectious diseases : IJID : official publication of the International Society for Infectious Diseases · 2023Pooled it
- Guidelines for the treatment of dysentery (shigellosis): a systematic review of the evidence.Paediatrics and international child health · 2018Pooled it
- Guidelines for the management of paediatric cholera infection: a systematic review of the evidence.Paediatrics and international child health · 2018Pooled it
- Identification and management of Shigella infection in children with diarrhoea: a systematic review and meta-analysis.The Lancet. Global health · 2017Pooled it
- ACG Clinical Guideline: Diagnosis, Treatment, and Prevention of Acute Diarrheal Infections in Adults.The American journal of gastroenterology · 2016Guideline
- Review
- The Impact of Non-Dysentery Shigella Infection on the Growth and Health of Children over Time (INSIGHT)-A Prospective Case-Control Study Protocol.Microorganisms · 2024Article
- Microbiological Methods Used in the Enterics for Global HealthOpen forum infectious diseases · 2024Article
- Evaluation of Fecal Inflammatory Biomarkers to Identify Bacterial Diarrhea Episodes: Systematic Review and Protocol for the Enterics for Global HealthOpen forum infectious diseases · 2024Article
- Article
- Healthcare providers' knowledge and clinical practice surrounding shigellosis - DocStyles Survey, 2020.BMC primary care · 2023Article
- Concordance between Genotypic and Phenotypic Drug-Resistant Profiles ofMicrobiology spectrum · 2023Article
- Impact of Rapid Molecular Multiplex Gastrointestinal Pathogen Testing in Management of Children during aJournal of clinical microbiology · 2023Article
- Clinical Prediction Rule to Guide Diagnostic Testing forOpen forum infectious diseases · 2023Article
- Antimicrobial-Resistant Shigella spp. in San Diego, California, USA, 2017-2020.Emerging infectious diseases · 2022Review
- Genomic epidemiology of persistently circulating MDR Shigella sonnei strains associated with men who have sex with men (MSM) in Belgium (2013-19).The Journal of antimicrobial chemotherapy · 2021Article
- Antimicrobial Properties of Chitosan and Chitosan Derivatives in the Treatment of Enteric Infections.Molecules (Basel, Switzerland) · 2021Review
- Diarrhea in an infant due to Shigella flexneri 1 carrying multiple cephalosporinase-encoding genes.Gut pathogens · 2021Article
- Shigella sonnei: virulence and antibiotic resistance.Archives of microbiology · 2021Review
Corrections and comments
- Update of
Authors and funding
4 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundShigella dysentery is a relatively common illness and occasionally causes death, worldwide. Mild symptoms are self-limiting but in more severe cases, antibiotics are recommended for cure and preventing relapse. The antibiotics recommended are diverse, have regional differences in sensitivity, and have side effects.
objectivesTo evaluate the efficacy and safety of antibiotics for treating Shigella dysentery. SEARCH STRATEGY: In June 2009 we identified all relevant trials from the following databases: Cochrane Infectious Diseases Group Specialized Register; Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials (CENTRAL) (The Cochrane Library 2008, issue 4), MEDLINE, EMBASE, LILACS and the metaRegister of Controlled Trials (mRCT). We also checked conference proceedings for relevant abstracts, and contacted researchers, organizations, and pharmaceutical companies. SELECTION CRITERIA: Randomized controlled trials of antibiotics for Shigella dysentery. DATA COLLECTION AND ANALYSIS: Four authors, working in pairs, independently assessed trial eligibility, methodological quality, and extracted data. We calculated risk ratios (RR) with 95% confidence intervals (CI) for dichotomous data, and used the random-effects model for significant heterogeneity. We explored possible sources of heterogeneity, when present, in subgroup analyses of participant age and percentage of participants with confirmed Shigella infection. MAIN
resultsSixteen trials (1748 participants), spanning four decades and with differing sensitivity to Shigella isolates, met the inclusion criteria. Seven were judged to be at risk of bias due to inadequate allocation concealment or blinding, and 12 due to incomplete reporting of outcome data. Limited data from one three-armed trial of people with moderately severe illness suggest that antibiotics reduce the episodes of diarrhoea at follow-up (furazolidone versus no drug RR 0.21, 95% CI 0.09 to 0.48, 73 participants; cotrimoxazole versus no drug RR 0.30, 95% CI 0.15 to 0.59, 76 participants).There was insufficient evidence to consider any class of antibiotic superior in efficacy in treating Shigella dysentery, but heterogeneity for some comparisons limits confidence in the results. All the antibiotics studied were safe. There was inadequate evidence regarding the role of antibiotics in preventing relapses. AUTHORS'
conclusionsAntibiotics reduce the duration of Shigella dysentery.Regularly updated local or regional antibiotic sensitivity patterns to different species and strains of Shigella are required to guide empiric therapy. More trials adhering to standard guidelines are required to evaluate the role of antibiotics in the treatment of severe forms of Shigella dysentery and in groups who are at high risk of complications.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.