SynthesisThe Cochrane database of systematic reviews2010
Calcium channel blockers versus other classes of drugs for hypertension.
Synthesis in The Cochrane database of systematic reviews, 2010. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 28 papers, 15 of them syntheses that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
28 citing papers in PubMed, 15 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 84 citations in OpenAlex.
- Higher blood pressure targets for hypertension in older adults.The Cochrane database of systematic reviews · 2024Pooled it
- Calcium channel blockers versus other classes of drugs for hypertension.The Cochrane database of systematic reviews · 2022Pooled it
- Calcium channel blockers versus other classes of drugs for hypertension.The Cochrane database of systematic reviews · 2021Pooled it
- First-line drugs inhibiting the renin angiotensin system versus other first-line antihypertensive drug classes for hypertension.The Cochrane database of systematic reviews · 2018Pooled it
- First-line renin-angiotensin system inhibitors vs. other first-line antihypertensive drug classes in hypertensive patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus.Journal of human hypertension · 2018Pooled it
- Systematic Review for the 2017 ACC/AHA/AAPA/ABC/ACPM/AGS/APhA/ASH/ASPC/NMA/PCNA Guideline for the Prevention, Detection, Evaluation, and Management of High Blood Pressure in Adults: A Report of the American College of Cardiology/American Heart Association Task Force on Clinical Practice Guidelines.Journal of the American College of Cardiology · 2018Pooled it
- First-line drugs for hypertension.The Cochrane database of systematic reviews · 2018Pooled it
- Blood pressure targets for hypertension in older adults.The Cochrane database of systematic reviews · 2017Pooled it
- Beta-blockers for hypertension.The Cochrane database of systematic reviews · 2017Pooled it
- First-line combination therapy versus first-line monotherapy for primary hypertension.The Cochrane database of systematic reviews · 2017Pooled it
- Combination therapy of renin-angiotensin system inhibitors plus calcium channel blockers versus other two-drug combinations for hypertension: a systematic review and meta-analysis.Journal of human hypertension · 2017Pooled it
- Blood pressure lowering efficacy of beta-1 selective beta blockers for primary hypertension.The Cochrane database of systematic reviews · 2016Pooled it
- Antihypertensive pharmacotherapy for prevention of sudden cardiac death in hypertensive individuals.The Cochrane database of systematic reviews · 2016Pooled it
- Blood pressure lowering efficacy of dual alpha and beta blockers for primary hypertension.The Cochrane database of systematic reviews · 2015Pooled it
- Time course for blood pressure lowering of dihydropyridine calcium channel blockers.The Cochrane database of systematic reviews · 2014Pooled it
- Unfavorable influence of amlodipine combined with metoprolol on the short-term prognosis in hypertensive heart failure patients.BMC cardiovascular disorders · 2025Article
- Article
- Treatment of calcium channel blocker-induced gingival overgrowth without modifying medication.BMJ case reports · 2021Article
- The renin-angiotensin-aldosterone system: a crossroad from arterial hypertension to heart failure.Heart failure reviews · 2020Review
- A Genome-Wide Association Study of Idiopathic Dilated Cardiomyopathy in African Americans.Journal of personalized medicine · 2018Article
Corrections and comments
- Updated by
Authors and funding
9 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundCalcium channel blockers (CCBs) are a relatively new antihypertensive class. The effect of first-line CCBs on the prevention of cardiovascular events, as compared with other antihypertensive drug classes, is unknown.
objectivesTo determine whether CCBs used as first-line therapy for hypertension are different from other first-line drug classes in reducing the incidence of major adverse cardiovascular events. SEARCH STRATEGY: Electronic searches of the Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials, MEDLINE, EMBASEand the WHO-ISH Collaboration Register (up to May 2009) were performed. We also checked the references of published studies to identify additional trials. SELECTION CRITERIA: Randomized controlled trial (RCT) comparing first-line CCBs with other antihypertensive classes, with at least 100 randomized hypertensive participants and with a follow-up of at least two years. DATA COLLECTION AND ANALYSIS: Two authors independently selected the included trials, evaluated the risk of bias and entered the data for analysis. MAIN
resultsEighteen RCTs (14 dihydropyridines, 4 non-dihydropyridines) with a total of 141,807 participants were included. All-cause mortality was not different between first-line CCBs and any other first-line antihypertensive classes. CCBs reduced the following outcomes as compared to beta-blockers: total cardiovascular events (RR 0.84, 95% CI [0.77, 0.92]), stroke (RR 0.77, 95% CI [0.67, 0.88]) and cardiovascular mortality (RR 0.90, 95% CI [0.81, 0.99]). CCBs increased total cardiovascular events (RR 1.05 , 95% CI [1.00, 1.09], p = 0.03) and congestive heart failure events (RR 1.37, 95% CI [1.25, 1.51]) as compared to diuretics. CCBs reduced stroke (RR 0.89, 95% CI [0.80, 0.98]) as compared to ACE inhibitors and reduced stroke (RR 0.85, 95% CI [0.73, 0.99]) and MI (RR 0.83, 95% CI [0.72, 0.96]) as compared to ARBs. CCBs also increased congestive heart failure events as compared to ACE inhibitors (RR 1.16, 95% CI [1.06, 1.27]) and ARBs (RR 1.20, 95% CI [1.06, 1.36]). The other evaluated outcomes were not significantly different. AUTHORS'
conclusionsDiuretics are preferred first-line over CCBs to optimize reduction of cardiovascular events. The review does not distinguish between CCBs, ACE inhibitors or ARBs, but does provide evidence supporting the use of CCBs over beta-blockers. Many of the differences found in the current review are not robust and further trials might change the conclusions. More well-designed RCTs studying the mortality and morbidity of patients taking CCBs as compared with other antihypertensive drug classes are needed for patients with different stages of hypertension, different ages, and with different co-morbidities such as diabetes.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.