Evidence map›Paper›PMID 20687062›Full record

SynthesisThe Cochrane database of systematic reviews2010

Vaccines for preventing cholera: killed whole cell or other subunit vaccines (injected).

Patricia M Graves, Jonathan J Deeks, Vittorio Demicheli, Tom Jefferson

Open access · greenAbstract readMeta-AnalysisSystematic Review
In one paragraph

Synthesis in The Cochrane database of systematic reviews, 2010. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 16 papers, 4 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
16citing papers in PubMed, 4 pooled it
3.1field-weighted citation impact, top 10% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

16 citing papers in PubMed, 4 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 31 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Oral killed cholera vaccines for preventing cholera.The Cochrane database of systematic reviews · 2024
    Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. Oral vaccines for preventing cholera.The Cochrane database of systematic reviews · 2011
    Pooled it
  5. Trial
  6. Recent epidemiological and management approaches for cholera in India.Proceedings (Baylor University. Medical Center) · 2026
    Review
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. The time of cholera.The Canadian journal of infectious diseases & medical microbiology = Journal canadien des maladies infectieuses et de la microbiologie medicale · 2011
    Article
  15. Evidence Aid and the disaster response in Pakistan and Haiti.The Cochrane database of systematic reviews · 2010
    Article
  16. Cholera Outbreaks in Urban Bangladesh In 2011.Epidemiology (Sunnyvale, Calif.)
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors at 3 institutions in 3 countries.

Patricia M GravesThe Carter Center, 453 Freedom Parkway, Atlanta, Georgia, USA, GA 30307.
Jonathan J Deeks
Vittorio Demicheli
Tom Jefferson
ASL Roma · ITCarter Center · USUniversity of Birmingham · GB

Funding

Medical Research Council G0800808
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundInjected cholera vaccines are rarely used today, although they may have some benefit. It is valuable to summarize the evidence for effectiveness of injected cholera vaccines for comparison with newer oral vaccines (subject of a separate Cochrane Review).

objectivesTo evaluate killed whole cell (KWC) cholera vaccines and other inactive subunit vaccines (administered by injection) for preventing cholera and death, and to evaluate the adverse effects. SEARCH STRATEGY: In September 2008, we searched the Cochrane Infectious Diseases Group Specialized Register, CENTRAL (The Cochrane Library 2008, Issue 3), EMBASE, and LILACS. We also searched reference lists and handsearched the journal Vaccine up to 1997. SELECTION CRITERIA: Randomized and quasi-randomized controlled trials comparing injected cholera vaccines (KWC or other inactive subunit) with placebo, control vaccines, or no intervention in adults and children irrespective of immune status or special risk category. DATA COLLECTION AND ANALYSIS: Two authors extracted data and assessed trial methodological quality independently. Dichotomous data were reported using the risk ratio (RR) with 95% confidence intervals (CI). Vaccine efficacies were also calculated (% vaccine efficacy = (1-RR) x 100%). MAIN

resultsSixteen trials, involving over one million adults, children and infants, fulfilled the inclusion criteria. Twenty-four comparisons reported on vaccine efficacy (cholera cases and/or deaths) and 11 comparisons considered adverse effects (nine reported on both). Compared to placebo, vaccinees had a reduced risk of death from cholera (RR 0.49, 95% CI 0.25 to 0.93; 837,442 participants) and a reduced risk of contracting cholera at 12 months (RR 0.52, 95% CI 0.42 to 0.65, random-effects model; 1,512,573 participants). This translates to an efficacy of 48%, 95% confidence interval 35% to 58%. Significant protection lasted for two years, even after only a single dose, and for three years with an annual booster. Children over five years and adults were protected for up to three years, while children under five years were protected for up to a year. Injected cholera vaccines were associated with more systemic and local adverse effects compared to placebo, but these were not severe or life-threatening. AUTHORS'

conclusionsInjected cholera vaccines appear to be safe and relatively more effective than usually realized. Protection against cholera persists for up to two years following a single dose of vaccine, and for three years with an annual booster. However, they have been superseded by oral vaccines.

Indexed as

AdultChildChild, PreschoolCholeraCholera VaccinesHumansInfantInjectionsRandomized Controlled Trials as TopicVaccinationVaccines, InactivatedCholera VaccinesVaccines, Inactivated

Identifiers

PMID20687062
PMCPMC6532721
OpenAlexW1607939748

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.