ArticleJournal of neuro-oncology2011
Different sized somatic NF1 locus rearrangements in neurofibromatosis 1-associated malignant peripheral nerve sheath tumors.
Article in Journal of neuro-oncology, 2011. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed, 9 citations in OpenAlex.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors at 4 institutions in 2 countries.
Funding
Abstract
Neurofibromatosis type 1 (NF1) patients are at increased risk of developing both benign (neurofibromas) and malignant (malignant peripheral nerve sheath tumors, MPNST) tumors. Molecular data on tumor progression are scarce, and few studies have compared the NF1 locus copy number in these two tumor types. To further explore the role of such NF1 locus rearrangements in NF1 tumorigenesis, and the likely disruption to the associated genes, the NF1 gene region was analyzed in NF1-associated tumors. DNA from three MPNSTs and one neurofibroma, excised from three unrelated NF1 patients, were analyzed using an NF1 region customized array-based comparative genomic hybridization. The somatic NF1 inactivation mutational mechanisms associated with MPNSTs appear to be different from those in benign neurofibromas. Interestingly, the MPNST-associated deletion breakpoints did not involve the paralogous repetitive sequences that are involved in most germline NF1 deletions. The somatic smallest common region of deletion overlap, however, was restricted to approximately the same ~2.2-Mb interval that encompassed most of the genes deleted in NF1 recurrent constitutional deletions. A number of genes in addition to NF1 on 17q (centromere to 17q24.2) may be involved in MPNST development. A larger study is warranted to confirm these findings. As NF1 patients with such germline NF1 deletions do exhibit increased risk of developing MPNST, these present findings emphasize the likely role of at least some of these NF1 flanking genes in MPNST pathobiology.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.